Ode to Allegiance

Allegiance discussion not belonging in another forum.
MagisterXF94
Posts: 1935
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 9:46 am
Location: Trieste, Italy

Post by MagisterXF94 »

QUOTE As far as the other response goes,I will not answer as I'm trying to be an adult about this.[/quote]


As am I.

you need to thicken your skin Raum. I was booted countless times by ryujin in my early days.
I was angry, because i thought i didn't deserve it.

But then I realized he was right and started learning from my mistakes.

Anyways when at an aleph the scout should always go first, we are expendable.

And yes nan bombers and save the day.

p.s whining on the forums does not help
QUOTE ^cashto@Elem (all): yeah, i imagine if you're rusty, you could build op short for no reason, build a naked ref, then go two techpaths even though your mining is by all objective standards $#@!ed[/quote]
Image
Djole88
Posts: 438
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2013 11:10 am
Location: Србија
Contact:

Post by Djole88 »

raumvogel wrote:QUOTE (raumvogel @ Jan 11 2017, 03:46 PM) Scout rams you thru aleph.Bomber dies on prox. = Scout is an idiot.
Yes, when the scout doesn't read the chat and proceeds ramming even though we're sure its proxed.
raumvogel wrote:QUOTE (raumvogel @ Jan 11 2017, 03:46 PM) Scout goes thru first,dies on prox.Bomber pays no attention to podded scout. = Scout is an idiot.
Yes, when the only scout available (so both eyes and nan) decides to be a hero and check for camp (although we're pretty sure its camped).
raumvogel wrote:QUOTE (raumvogel @ Jan 11 2017, 03:46 PM) Scout doesn't ram you thru aleph and there is no prox. = Scout is an idiot.
Yes, obviously.
raumvogel wrote:QUOTE (raumvogel @ Jan 11 2017, 03:46 PM) Moral of story = Don't nan bombers.
Moral of the story = Don't be an idiot
MagisterXF94
Posts: 1935
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 9:46 am
Location: Trieste, Italy

Post by MagisterXF94 »

Djole88 wrote:QUOTE (Djole88 @ Jan 12 2017, 02:29 PM) Yes, when the scout doesn't read the chat and proceeds ramming even though we're sure its proxed.


Yes, when the only scout available (so both eyes and nan) decides to be a hero and check for camp (although we're pretty sure its camped).


Yes, obviously.


Moral of the story = Don't be an idiot
+1
QUOTE ^cashto@Elem (all): yeah, i imagine if you're rusty, you could build op short for no reason, build a naked ref, then go two techpaths even though your mining is by all objective standards $#@!ed[/quote]
Image
Shizoku
Posts: 5816
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Ozzy's right nut.

Post by Shizoku »

"Absorb the mines!"
Image
zombywoof
Posts: 6523
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:59 am
Location: Over the Rainbow

Post by zombywoof »

And I mean, ints should go in before the bbr but most int pilots have the situational awareness of a quashed ant.
Image
Don't find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain.
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Apr 1 2009, 09:35 PM) But I don't read the forums I only post.
raumvogel
Posts: 5910
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 7:00 am
Location: My lawn
Contact:

Post by raumvogel »

Senor NoirSol wrote:QUOTE (Senor NoirSol @ Jan 12 2017, 04:38 AM) As am I.

you need to thicken your skin Raum. I was booted countless times by ryujin in my early days.
I was angry, because i thought i didn't deserve it.

But then I realized he was right and started learning from my mistakes.

Anyways when at an aleph the scout should always go first, we are expendable.

And yes nan bombers and save the day.

p.s whining on the forums does not help
OK, you are not aware of why I made that original post.I was yelled at for doing just what you are suggesting.I went in first and was screamed at by the comm,who was piloting the bomber.So don't tell me to get a thick skin when you can't read my original post.There are 3 ways to handle going through the aleph and the nan is always to blame when the comm/Bomber pilot doesn't state how they want the bomb run handled.
I have always taken the position of "Anyways when at an aleph the scout should always go first, we are expendable."But I get bitched at or the bomber crashes through and dies anyways.Or both.
So I was right in the first place but the ego's yell at me for "not knowing how to nan after 15 years of playing the game".
F getting a thicker skin...I'm right...........................they are wrong!

And the bit about whining is BS.I'm trying to communicate so the community can get it's @#(! together and agree on what to do insstead of losing players after they get yelled at for not doing something correctly when there are 3 different opinions on how to do it.
Last edited by raumvogel on Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
raumvogel
Posts: 5910
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 7:00 am
Location: My lawn
Contact:

Post by raumvogel »

Djole88 wrote:QUOTE (Djole88 @ Jan 12 2017, 08:29 AM) Yes, when the scout doesn't read the chat and proceeds ramming even though we're sure its proxed.


Yes, when the only scout available (so both eyes and nan) decides to be a hero and check for camp (although we're pretty sure its camped).


Yes, obviously.


Moral of the story = Don't be an idiot
Well,the idiot kept askng for communications (while pushing the bomber to the aleph) and got no response.

And I stoped ramming at 1500 and went ahead because I thought it was camped and wanted to save the bomber from being podded.
Last edited by raumvogel on Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
raumvogel
Posts: 5910
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 7:00 am
Location: My lawn
Contact:

Post by raumvogel »

phoenix1 wrote:QUOTE (phoenix1 @ Jan 12 2017, 01:29 PM) And I mean, ints should go in before the bbr but most int pilots have the situational awareness of a quashed ant.
^^^^ This ^^^^
Image
zombywoof
Posts: 6523
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:59 am
Location: Over the Rainbow

Post by zombywoof »

I tend to disagree. I think the bbr should almost always go in first: it should be ints, bbr, nans. Why? Simple. Because idiots in ints will SHOOT THE FIRST THING THEY SEE. If they use all their ammo on the ints, then lolololol we did it. But the best case scenario is they spend 3-5 seconds shooting the bbr being like "NO WE CAN SPIKE IT THERE ARE NO NANS" only to be woefully surprised when in comes a handful of nans to just push that bbr back to tip top shape. Then each int has to reacquire targets (and some, and frankly Raum you have the rep of being one of these ints, simply will not reacquire a target and unload a clip uselessly into the bbr) while having diminished ammo.

If the nans enter first, all the ints are going to be like, "oooh, a scout to kill!" and pod one or two scouts before the bbr gets in.

People are too quick to forget that non-zero hull on a bbr is the same as full hull on a bbr so long as you have nans in place.

The other thing nans do that PISSES ME OFF is they fly out from the cover of the turrets/other nans. I know, I know, you want to be all "dodge the mean int bullets" but frankly you're better off if you STAY CLOSE TO THE DAMN BBR so I don't have to run out into the middle of nowhere to nan you up when Dome wants kb.

It's even worse with sfs... literally the only way to bomb vs sfs (because countermeasures are the dumbest mechanic in gaming ever) is to stick close and nan whoever takes a missile to the face. Yet everyone just scatters trying to outrun missiles.
Image
Don't find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain.
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Apr 1 2009, 09:35 PM) But I don't read the forums I only post.
raumvogel
Posts: 5910
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 7:00 am
Location: My lawn
Contact:

Post by raumvogel »

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^I'll repeat this^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The first thing you need to do after you realise there are sf's targeting the bomber train is to see who is taking damage and NAN them!
Image
Post Reply