Whatever the community decides on. Could change every week. Maybe even 2v6.HSharp wrote:QUOTE (HSharp @ Aug 7 2011, 01:50 PM) Ok so you want 1vs1vs1vs1vs1vs1vs1vs1 or a 4vs4? Either way I think PKK has some work to do.
Anything worthwhile is a hassle.HSharp wrote:QUOTE (HSharp @ Aug 7 2011, 01:50 PM) 1) It's a hassle to work these events especially when it comes to balancing teams (for numbers, can lead to a lot of sitters)
2) It's a hassle for time
These are very good points. But as I asked One-Man-Bucket, how bad is the lag? Is it tolerable?HSharp wrote:QUOTE (HSharp @ Aug 7 2011, 01:50 PM) 3) It's more laggy and squad games are supposed to be best players fighting it out which is much more fun when everyone isn't lag-jumping
4) It's not as competitive as a regular squad game, the bigger the game the more circle flying there is (even for squaddies)
5) No one apart from you wants to do this, SysX explicitly says no, XT explicitly says no and that's already half of squad members anyway.
How is it not as competitive? Because of the lag? Having more players seems to be more competitive to me.
Ya, if SysX and XT don't want it, or aren't willing to try it then it will never happen. Are they willing to try it again just once though?
Why does being a creationist make me an idiot?HSharp wrote:QUOTE (HSharp @ Aug 7 2011, 01:50 PM) 6) Your an idiot because you don't already realise these above facts and your a creationist.
EDIT:
That was never the original idea.DasSmiter wrote:QUOTE (DasSmiter @ Aug 7 2011, 02:51 PM) And the original idea of a melting pot game is terrible.
Also... WTF? HOW DOES THIS HAPPEN? Once again I post on page 5 post 1... 51.