Squad League 2010

Valiance · Post by **Valiance** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:31 pm

FIFY?

(PS, I still love your charts BadP even if the bracket ones are incredibly confusing)

badpazzword · Post by **badpazzword** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:33 pm

FIFY = Fixed it for ya.

The bracket images are as simple as they can be -- and not any simpler

Valiance · Post by **Valiance** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:34 pm

I know they, but I still used to get headaches figuring out how they worked.

notjarvis · Post by **notjarvis** » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:07 pm

Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Jan 4 2010, 11:25 AM) The divisions are based on last year's leage placings and are as follows:

Valiance wrote:QUOTE (Valiance @ Jan 4 2010, 09:28 PM) Based off last years league shouldn't GB be in the top rung

We didn't compete in last years league.

Frankly - I think GB's ranking is correct - the only team we have beaten out of the top division in the past year is SF, and at the moment they appear the weakest to me.

Doesn't mean we won't continue to improve.

omegahero · Post by **omegahero** » Tue Jan 05, 2010 12:05 am

i think it kinda sucks div2 teams cannot have a chance of winning for a whole year.

Broodwich · Post by **Broodwich** » Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:03 am

if you look at who is in it you can tell they dont have a chance regardless

AaronMoore · Post by **AaronMoore** » Tue Jan 05, 2010 3:01 am

Sry if this is a silly question:
Does 'at' stand for attack, meaning that team will be 'Away' (not have the initial pick)?

And what will we do after June? Doubles?
Thanks guys, the tournament looks good.

Post by **Raveen** » Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:24 am

Fever wrote:QUOTE (Fever @ Jan 5 2010, 12:05 AM) i think it kinda sucks div2 teams cannot have a chance of winning for a whole year.

As Brrod said, the Div 2 teams don't stand a realistic chance of winning overall. So now they play less games that they'll get hammered in and get more even SGs. With the bonus that they can compete for promotion.

In all honesty I think that Div 2 is the more interesting competition just now.

omegahero · Post by **omegahero** » Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:00 am

i understand but still i think they should be a given a chance to lose rather than having it decided for them not have a chance at all.

i mean, without such institutional basis, 'fairytale stories' could never happen. look how many people were rooting for GB in the tourney?

but then thats just aussie culture i guess.

badpazzword · Post by **badpazzword** » Tue Jan 05, 2010 12:55 pm

Unfortunately there are not enough weeks in the year to have 18 league weeks, 5 doubles weeks, 8 tourney weeks, 12 weeks to be skipped for holidays and enough backup weeks for server crashes and for regular SGs and having the league end before summer when activity sinks.