Move NG to TTs and HTTs? Probably an NG HTT would become needlessly* expensive, but NG TTs could be used to cap the small stuff.
*unless the driver is so bad at capping the weird doors that really needs to use NG to cap after shooting the shields down.
Let's take a look at NG sbs
I think Clay has the right line of thinking. The only reason why we're discussing this is because someone thought that something we currently don't use should MAYBE be fixed. I think the game plays fine without it. We dont' hear people complaining about NG sbs not working. SBs do a fine enough job killing bases. NG would just be icing on the cake.
Even the idea of allowing NG to cap small bases - why bother? A small base can be easily destroyed by one or two SBs.
Given our current situation of one, if not two, additional factions being added to our cores, I think we just simply should cut the fat and get rid of unneccessary items. I would rather fly more factions than rarely used items given the choice.
Even the idea of allowing NG to cap small bases - why bother? A small base can be easily destroyed by one or two SBs.
Given our current situation of one, if not two, additional factions being added to our cores, I think we just simply should cut the fat and get rid of unneccessary items. I would rather fly more factions than rarely used items given the choice.
My point, whether or not it was clear as such (I can be confusing even to myself at times), was that if we are going to keep NG sbs then they need to be useful.

Don't find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain.
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Apr 1 2009, 09:35 PM) But I don't read the forums I only post.
You can get HC1 under garrison, can't you? And I didn't think people were talking about HC only, just allow them to mount it at all.spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ May 5 2009, 05:18 AM) So it seems the suggestions in this thread are:
-Remove them
-Make NG SB's mount Hvy Cloak only (so you must have a starbase as most factions to use Ng SB's?)
-Slightly increase the NG SB's hull
Am I missing anything
-make the research cheaper, or tie it directly to normal sb research.
Last edited by juckto on Mon May 04, 2009 10:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Usually though, "skill" is used to covertly mean "match the game exactly to my level of competence." Anyone who is at all worse than me should fail utterly (and humorously!) and anyone better is clearly too caught up in the game and their opinions shouldn't count.
-
CronoDroid
- Posts: 4606
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:00 am
- Contact:
My suggestion was to tie NG SBs to heavy bombers (or other expensive tech in order to make NGs extremely late game tech). Also, do what it takes with tweaking range, sig, mount time etc. so they can fire on an adv techbase within 10 seconds of being eyed. (Skilled pilot vs. skilled defense should still succeed 25-50% of time, provided NG isn't found earlier what with its higher base sig).spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ May 4 2009, 10:18 AM) Does this include eliminating NG from Belter's SY as well?
And they wouldn't be missed as they currently are because they are just so dang unusable.
So it seems the suggestions in this thread are:
-Remove them
-Make NG SB's mount Hvy Cloak only (so you must have a starbase as most factions to use Ng SB's?)
-Slightly increase the NG SB's hull
Am I missing anything
Or remove. I'm good with that too.
Last edited by cashto on Tue May 05, 2009 2:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Globemaster_III wrote:QUOTE (Globemaster_III @ Jan 11 2018, 11:27 PM) as you know i think very little of cashto, cashto alway a flying low pilot, he alway flying a trainer airplane and he rented
unless you are perking ng sbs hull by alot it wont mean anything except to belters. also i almost said exactly what juckto said before i scrolled up and read his post =)
edit: well his first line anyway
edit: well his first line anyway
Last edited by Broodwich on Tue May 05, 2009 3:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
QUOTE Drizzo: ha ha good old chap
Drizzo: i am a brit
Drizzo: tut tut
Drizzo: wankarrrrrr
Drizzo: i only have sex whilst in the missionary position[/quote] Fas est et ab hoste doceri - Ovid
Drizzo: i am a brit
Drizzo: tut tut
Drizzo: wankarrrrrr
Drizzo: i only have sex whilst in the missionary position[/quote] Fas est et ab hoste doceri - Ovid
I'd say remove NG SBs, Clay makes an excellent argument as to why.spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ May 4 2009, 06:18 PM) Does this include eliminating NG from Belter's SY as well?
And they wouldn't be missed as they currently are because they are just so dang unusable.
So it seems the suggestions in this thread are:
-Remove them
-Make NG SB's mount Hvy Cloak only (so you must have a starbase as most factions to use Ng SB's?)
-Slightly increase the NG SB's hull
Am I missing anything
Rethink NG in SY as part of the wider scale SY rethink that Apoch mentioned - probably for all factions, not just Belters. it makes some sort of sense for SY to be the only kill or capture techpath and also means that if another tech buys SY as a secondary tech then they get the option to kill/capture with it in addition to whatever tech they currently have.
There is nothing else to say...Clay_Pigeon wrote:QUOTE (Clay_Pigeon @ May 3 2009, 06:06 PM) Let's eliminate NG sbs altogether. I doubt they will be missed.
The Escapist (Justin Emerson) @ Dec 21 2010, 02:33 PM:
The history of open-source Allegiance is paved with the bodies of dead code branches, forum flame wars, and personal vendettas. But a community remains because people still love the game.
-
Clay_Pigeon
- Posts: 3211
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:00 am
- Location: my pod
For the record, I think NG Cruisers is a different matter that should be addressed separately.

"Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ's power may rest on me." -2 Cor 12:9
"Never know how long I've waited, anticipated your smile pressed against mine." -Running


