Rix station pod warning

Development area for FreeAllegiance's Community Core.
pkk
Posts: 5419
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Germany, Munich

Post by pkk »

Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Apr 14 2009, 11:13 AM) Won't that just broadcast the "Station at risk from TP" message? You really want a new message dedicated to station drones.
You can change that message with the next FAZ release to just "Station at risk".

CODEsrc/Igc/common.cpp line 2313:

const char* GetClusterWarningText(ClusterWarning cw)
{
static const char* c_pszAlerts[c_cwMax] =
{
"No threat",
"Enemy fighter spotted",
"Enemy miner spotted",
"Enemy builder spotted",
"Conflict",
"Miner at risk",
"Builder at risk",
"Carrier at risk",
"Enemy bomber spotted",
"Enemy carrier spotted",
"Enemy capital ship spotted",
"Enemy assault ship spotted",
"Enemy transport spotted",
"Station at risk",
"Station at risk by teleport",
"Station at risk of capture"
};

Once again, you can still bomb "uneyed", because the pods will trigger that message, not the bomber. Rix may loose two secs on SB warining.
The Escapist (Justin Emerson) @ Dec 21 2010, 02:33 PM:
The history of open-source Allegiance is paved with the bodies of dead code branches, forum flame wars, and personal vendettas. But a community remains because people still love the game.
Makida
Posts: 1793
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 12:04 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Makida »

Couldn't you change it to something like "Station at risk by drone" or something else that could be seen to apply to both situations? Or, is it possible at all to simply add another message?
Icky
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:00 am

Post by Icky »

Valiance wrote:QUOTE (Valiance @ Apr 13 2009, 07:08 PM) To make up for the sfs
Please stop posting about things you know nothing about.

CD2/3 + Prox = Badass SF
Terran wrote:QUOTE (Terran @ Jan 20 2011, 03:56 PM) i'm like adept
Broodwich wrote:QUOTE (Broodwich @ Jun 6 2010, 10:19 PM) if you spent as much time in game as trollin sf might not be dead
Adept
Posts: 8660
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Turku, Finland

Post by Adept »

Icky wrote:QUOTE (Icky @ Apr 14 2009, 06:58 PM) CD2/3 + Prox = Badass SF
Not to mention one gets to probe in peace in one of those bad boys.
Last edited by Adept on Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImageImageImageImage
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
CronoDroid
Posts: 4606
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:00 am
Contact:

Post by CronoDroid »

Why you people always gotta talk about nerfing Rix? I don't want people to get the "STATION AT RISK" warning so Rix SBs CAN SB uneyed and unhindered besides those rare people who see the drones and pop out to defend. It's perfectly fair considering Rix has never been the strongest faction in the first place. They don't need nerfs I say.

A techpath has to be the best. Let it be Rix Tacspansion.
HSharp
Posts: 5192
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 11:18 am
Location: Brum, UK

Post by HSharp »

CronoDroid wrote:QUOTE (CronoDroid @ Apr 14 2009, 10:07 PM) Why you people always gotta talk about nerfing Rix? I don't want people to get the "STATION AT RISK" warning so Rix SBs CAN SB uneyed and unhindered besides those rare people who see the drones and pop out to defend. It's perfectly fair considering Rix has never been the strongest faction in the first place. They don't need nerfs I say.

A techpath has to be the best. Let it be Rix Tacspansion.
Rix isn't the weakest faction thats for sure, they have pretty damn good techpaths no-matter what you choose, there is a reason why it was an expensive fleet in AW.
Image
Image
sambasti
Posts: 1054
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:55 am
Location: the SF hiding in your home

Post by sambasti »

Actually, if I'm not mistaken, during AW:FC, spidey and aarm agreed to make rix the most expensive faction. I am fairly confident they did that for a reason.
Makida
Posts: 1793
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 12:04 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Makida »

I thought IC was the most expensive faction during Allegiance Wars.

I'm fully for nerfing IC, if that's what you're suggesting. ^_^
Last edited by Makida on Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Clay_Pigeon
Posts: 3211
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:00 am
Location: my pod

Post by Clay_Pigeon »

IC miniguns should fire baby chicks instead of bullets.
Image
"Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ's power may rest on me." -2 Cor 12:9
"Never know how long I've waited, anticipated your smile pressed against mine." -Running
mcwarren4
Posts: 3722
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Post by mcwarren4 »

I was attempting to troll Clay Pigeon once again and I saw some of the above comments, but have not read the entire thread. IC was the most expensive faction in AW. First of all, remember that is only two people's opinion on the matter. Not a sample size I would feel comfortable with.

Second, the methodology we used was to simply take each of their ranks and average them. IC just happened to have the highest average weight between the two voters (spidey and aarm), but it was not #1 on both of their lists. I believe spidey ranked belters #1 and IC #2 while aarm ranked IC #1 and something else #2, but belters was further down on his list giving IC the advantage in the average.

Lastly, even though they both voted IC high on the list that doesn't necessarily mean they felt it was the most powerful. IC is widely recognized as the easiest faction to command. I think the fact that they knew they were going to have to give command to multiple people of varying skill levels throughout AW would have been a factor in making IC a more expensive faction given it is more simple to command. I have no idea if that weighed into their own personal equations but it would have swayed mine.

That is all!
Image What Allegiance needs is a little more cowbell. Image
Post Reply