Points for nanning

Youngmoose · Post by **Youngmoose** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:44 pm

Well I'll be dipped in dog crap. Details?

AaronMoore · Post by **AaronMoore** » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:00 am

If we got points for nanning I would just nan everything that moves!
Well that's what i did when I used to play TF2....

NAN NAN NAN NAN NAN NAN

Do you have a nan? Why yes I do!

MrChaos · Post by **MrChaos** » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:05 am

The points at the end of the game do NOT effect your rank

Post by **zombywoof** » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:21 am

These guys aren't rank whores, they're end of game killboard whores.

WTF.

Makida · Post by **Makida** » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:54 am

I always get a little thrill whenever I end up anywhere near the top of the end-of-game score list.

It... it sometimes happens... >_>

Death3D · Post by **Death3D** » Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:34 am

Go pickup some pods and eye some miners.

uberkill · Post by **uberkill** » Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:41 am

Can we make it so we can nan He back into rocks, too? that'd be SUPER awesome, kthx.

Actually, i like this idea, because i LOVE to nan and prox the ints. BUUUUT it would create all sorts of crazy consequences. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. plus:

MrChaos wrote:QUOTE (MrChaos @ Mar 24 2009, 08:05 PM) The points at the end of the game do NOT effect your rank

Post by **zombywoof** » Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:08 am

It would create absolutely no consequence. There is no effect of counting the HP nanned server side. There is no effect in counting those towards points. Anyone who says "But if you do that it'll be eleventy billion points!~!11!1!!!!" is clearly less intelligent than your average squirrel. You don't have to award 1 point/1 HP nanned, obviously, and neither does the 'damage healed' have to go on the leaderboard (but you're apparently too stupid to realize that, Cronodolt) and at the end of the day it's just about whether or not scoutwhores get the epeen they want or not.

My stance? I don't care one way or another. It's a useless change that will do nothing because regardless of what youngmoose says, points don't matter. The kind of person who *needs* to be at the top of the killboard is the same kind of person who *needs* to be sitting most games in NOAT.

cowtown · Post by **cowtown** » Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:18 am

phoenix1 wrote:QUOTE (phoenix1 @ Mar 24 2009, 08:08 PM) The kind of person who *needs* to be at the top of the killboard is the same kind of person who *needs* to be sitting most games in NOAT.

QFT..

You arent talking about IB now are you ?

Picobozo · Post by **Picobozo** » Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:18 am

If a hook could be implemented to keep track of nanning then perhaps it could have it's own column (I think Crono already said this). To some people that could be important.

As to it being abused. If there is somebody willing to ram a rock and then have another person nan him for hours, then those same people could start up a server and just pod each other all day for KPH spoofing. Or lock the server and just cap each others garrison on Brawl for a full day (which people were banned for in the AZ). Or bombing, or miner killing, or ...........I think you get the idea.

If it can be added and one of the dev/stats team wants to spend the time to add it, then I don't see why it couldn't be implemented.

The real question now is, should it affect your rank?

Oh wait:

SHOULD IT AFFECT YOUR RANK!?!?!