Interceptor signature

Development area for FreeAllegiance's Community Core.
guitarism
Posts: 2240
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:00 am
Location: Richmond

Post by guitarism »

Both would be a better thing.
FIZ wrote:QUOTE (FIZ @ Feb 28 2011, 04:56 PM) After Slap I use Voltaire for light reading.
CronoDroid wrote:QUOTE (CronoDroid @ Jan 23 2009, 07:46 PM) If you're going to go GT, go Exp, unless you're Gooey. But Gooey is nuts.
QUOTE [20:13] <DasSmiter> I like to think that one day he logged on and accidentally clicked his way to the EoR forum
[20:13] <DasSmiter> And his heart exploded in a cloud of fury[/quote]
Adept
Posts: 8660
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Turku, Finland

Post by Adept »

juckto wrote:QUOTE (juckto @ Feb 19 2009, 01:55 AM) Fixed.

Nothing about the int's "design" indicates to me that it was designed for hunting. Its lack of ripcord, low cruising speed, and its pathetic scan indicates the opposite.
As per usual Juckto can actually put to words what I was trying to say. :iluv:

Exactly. Boosts towards prey and blast it to bits with miniguns - that is an interceptor. Sneaking around to ambush things, leave that to stealth figs.
ImageImageImageImageImage
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
Sealer
Posts: 1583
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: A womb

Post by Sealer »

Gappy wrote:QUOTE (Gappy @ Feb 19 2009, 02:18 AM) I'd rather see their fuel lowered a bit myself, but an increase to 125% sig would also go a long way.
Me likes.
Image
"For save the world from this epic gay, Clint have this hope : he would put something great and big in his ass."
hartzaden
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 3:21 pm

Post by hartzaden »

yes there sig needs to be rased
Dorjan
Posts: 5024
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 9:56 am
Location: England

Post by Dorjan »

Their sig needs raising, fuel decreased and damage increased!
I decided to relive the days gone by in my new blog.
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Jan 31 2012, 03:09 PM) True story.

Except the big about dorjan being jelly, that's just spidey's ego.
ImageImage
Sealer
Posts: 1583
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: A womb

Post by Sealer »

Dorjan wrote:QUOTE (Dorjan @ Feb 26 2009, 03:16 PM) Their sig needs raising, fuel decreased and damage increased!
Yes, miniguns are way too weak atm. I suggest 50 % increase of damage to each minigun and some more ammo, too!
Image
"For save the world from this epic gay, Clint have this hope : he would put something great and big in his ass."
Dorjan
Posts: 5024
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 9:56 am
Location: England

Post by Dorjan »

and missiles! Yeah!

+ they need prox too!
I decided to relive the days gone by in my new blog.
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Jan 31 2012, 03:09 PM) True story.

Except the big about dorjan being jelly, that's just spidey's ego.
ImageImage
badpazzword
Posts: 3627
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 8:00 am
Contact:

Post by badpazzword »

AB2 ints!
Have gaming questions? Get expert answers! Image Image
Dorjan
Posts: 5024
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 9:56 am
Location: England

Post by Dorjan »

Don't be crazy bp!
I decided to relive the days gone by in my new blog.
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Jan 31 2012, 03:09 PM) True story.

Except the big about dorjan being jelly, that's just spidey's ego.
ImageImage
HSharp
Posts: 5192
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 11:18 am
Location: Brum, UK

Post by HSharp »

We need int bombers! Sup has fig bombers, tac has stealth bombers, its only logical to have int bombers
Image
Image
Post Reply