CC_02 Feedback

gr4vity · Post by **gr4vity** » Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:10 pm

Hey Apoch..

did you guys thought about slightly increasing the TF Int hitbox yet?
(TF Exp was already quite strong before CC took some of the nerfs back and it seems quite uber atm - partially because of that hard to hit ints

)

Adept · Post by **Adept** » Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:54 pm

gr4vity wrote:QUOTE (gr4vity @ Oct 22 2008, 07:10 PM) Hey Apoch..

did you guys thought about slightly increasing the TF Int hitbox yet?
(TF Exp was already quite strong before CC took some of the nerfs back and it seems quite uber atm - partially because of that hard to hit ints )

I'd be happy if the lead indicators were removed. It's just boring to fly them, and annoying to fly against them.

apochboi · Post by **apochboi** » Wed Oct 22, 2008 6:09 pm

gr4vity wrote:QUOTE (gr4vity @ Oct 22 2008, 05:10 PM) Hey Apoch..

did you guys thought about slightly increasing the TF Int hitbox yet?
(TF Exp was already quite strong before CC took some of the nerfs back and it seems quite uber atm - partially because of that hard to hit ints )

I believe Ramaglor is working on new models for TF figs and Ints. It's not really something we have discussed yet to be honest. I'll look into it.

Ramaglor · Post by **Ramaglor** » Thu Oct 23, 2008 4:51 am

Yeah I have the fig completed, and if I decide I don't hate the int model I made, I have that mostly done too. They are both rather different proportions to the current models.

gr4vity · Post by **gr4vity** » Thu Oct 23, 2008 2:05 pm

Cool. Good to know.

DasSmiter · Post by **DasSmiter** » Thu Oct 23, 2008 4:26 pm

you're removing xrm and you're increasing the hit box on my snakez

maybe i should just uninstall...

gr4vity · Post by **gr4vity** » Thu Oct 23, 2008 4:55 pm

What a productive post!

(No you don't have to reply to it

)

Ramaglor · Post by **Ramaglor** » Thu Oct 23, 2008 6:04 pm

Das, either learn to read or shut up. No one said we were making tf ints easier to hit or to increase it's size. If in the event that my new model's proportions make it much easier to hit, we can simply decrease it's size.

DasSmiter · Post by **DasSmiter** » Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:33 am

Ramaglor wrote:QUOTE (Ramaglor @ Oct 23 2008, 02:51 PM) They [int and fig models] are both rather different proportions to the current models.

new models almost always mess up the current dynamic, and with different proportions its easy to assume that you will be at least changing the x axis stretch the ints have currently

but thanks for being polite, because i know its hard to take my incessant whining about changes affecting things i like

Ramaglor · Post by **Ramaglor** » Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:14 am

I apologize for reacting so harshly and rashly. I've had little patience over the past two weeks because life has been so stressful.
Anyway, its seems relatively common for some vets to complain/suggest/etc about things going on in development subforums without backing up anything they say. We already have this from noobs/voobs so please add reason to your posts! I don't think you are one of those "regulars" who seem to like to throw wrenches into things so I apologize for reacting to your one transgression.

With regards to the new models, the new fig model is longer than the current one.
The current TF int is the widest int by far (like 1.5+ times as wide as the next widest).