Lt ints, ints,hvy ints and chaff

Zero_Falcon · Post by **Zero_Falcon** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:53 am

So I looked up cc_11 and cc_11b and noticed lvl2 ints have 1 less chaff than its counterparts...

It doesn't make sense

Also it may just be me, but I thought I posted this topic earlier and now I can't find it? Whut dah?

Adept · Post by **Adept** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 1:23 pm

Thanks. I hadn't noticed that.

It's from DN, and nobody has noticed.

Adept · Post by **Adept** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 1:30 pm

Update.

The silly 4 / 3 / 4 is from the MS days. Apparently ints had 3 CMs and heavy ints had 4. Then MS added light interceptors, and forgot about ints giving the lt ints 4 CMs as well. Spunky has cought on back in the day, since in A+ the progression is a sane 3 / 3 / 4.

Should it go 3 / 3 / 4 or 4 / 4 / 4? What do people think? I wonder if these should be a poll.

notjarvis · Post by **notjarvis** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 1:38 pm

Damn that's stupid.

3 / 3 / 4 makes sense for me as I assume that's how MS probably intended it.

Not sure it's a big enough issue for a poll though.

Alien51 · Post by **Alien51** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:25 pm

Ya I like the 3 / 3 / 4 thing.

avirst · Post by **avirst** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 4:18 pm

sounds reasonable, I mean hvy ints are suppose to be the best far none, am I right?

cashto · Post by **cashto** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 4:18 pm

Adept wrote:QUOTE (Adept @ Feb 23 2011, 05:23 AM) It's from DN, and nobody has noticed.

If I'm not mistaken, Night's fixed this in XC01. (I think it's 3 / 4 / 5 there).

Adept · Post by **Adept** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 4:47 pm

cashto wrote:QUOTE (cashto @ Feb 23 2011, 06:18 PM) If I'm not mistaken, Night's fixed this in XC01. (I think it's 3 / 4 / 5 there).

That's one way to look at it, but I doubt heavy ints need the boost.

Spunkmeyer · Post by **Spunkmeyer** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 4:50 pm

This is already on the CC12 list as 3/3/4

sfx_offender · Post by **sfx_offender** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:02 pm

Plz adjust to XC values.