My First Model

beeman · Post by **beeman** » Sat Aug 16, 2008 10:43 pm

I did the first tutorial, messed around...here is what 10 minutes got me...and I've never modeled anything before in my life.

Just think if I knew how to model and spent , say, 1 hour ?

Death3D · Post by **Death3D** » Sat Aug 16, 2008 10:45 pm

Smooth operator.

Adept · Post by **Adept** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 12:03 am

That's pretty nice!

Makes me think it's a stealth fighter / stealth bomber, or maybe a frigate.

MrChaos · Post by **MrChaos** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 12:22 am

I remember my first model. She was an underwear model who did shows at the local bars but....

/huh.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":huh:" border="0" alt="huh.gif" />

* looks up *
* mouth moves as he reads the words again *

/doh.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":doh:" border="0" alt="doh.gif" />

Never mind

beeman · Post by **beeman** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 12:35 am

MrChaos wrote:QUOTE (MrChaos @ Aug 16 2008, 07:22 PM) I remember my first model. She was an underwear model who did shows at the local bars but....
/huh.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":huh:" border="0" alt="huh.gif" />
* looks up *
* mouth moves as he reads the words again *
/doh.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":doh:" border="0" alt="doh.gif" />

Never mind

Yeah, but mine took about 10 mins. Mr. C...I know ur first model was about 30 seconds.

neotoxin · Post by **neotoxin** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 12:44 am

I never understood the purpose of adding wings to spacecraft designed for non-orbital flight...

EDIT: Aside from having thrusters mounted on the tips of each wing to amplify the amount of mechanical force used in said thruster. Ah, nevermind. Anyone who took physics/statics knows what I mean.

zdude1994 · Post by **zdude1994** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 12:48 am

Neo has a point....... They're solar panels neo.

beeman · Post by **beeman** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 12:55 am

neotoxin wrote:QUOTE (neotoxin @ Aug 16 2008, 07:44 PM) I never understood the purpose of adding wings to spacecraft designed for non-orbital flight...

EDIT: Aside from having thrusters mounted on the tips of each wing to amplify the amount of mechanical force used in said thruster. Ah, nevermind. Anyone who took physics/statics knows what I mean.

There are 2 reasons:

1) They look cool.
2) The spacecraft is designed both for atmospheric as well as non-atmospheric flight.

Evincar · Post by **Evincar** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 3:54 am

neotoxin wrote:QUOTE (neotoxin @ Aug 16 2008, 04:44 PM) EDIT: Aside from having thrusters mounted on the tips of each wing to amplify the amount of mechanical force used in said thruster. Ah, nevermind. Anyone who took physics/statics knows what I mean.

that's why you are going for women studies

Norgonq1 · Post by **Norgonq1** » Sun Aug 17, 2008 9:14 am

That's the good thing about space, you can focus more on making your craft stylish.

Anyway, I don't want to try hitting that slim thing.