Lrm 2 & 3 gives Combat Pod 2 & 3

[Tontow]

AB Missile tech gives you the equivalent AB Cannon tech, so why not do the same with Lrm and Combat pod?

[Dark_Sponge]

QUOTE (tontow @ Mar 19 2008, 07:28 PM) AB Missile tech gives you the equivalent AB Cannon tech, so why not do the same with Lrm and Combat pod?

I agree, bringing home incompatible tech should give you something for rix like it does for TF

[Camaro]

I am NOT in favor of this.

Rix Stinger 2 is = to AB3 and they are not stealable.

Likewise, TF EW AB cannons are not stealable and TF cannot steal an AB into a cannon.

Its things like these that ACTUALLY allow commanders to buy AB3 or EW AB3 which is almost never bought normally.

[apochboi]

Hmmm, I am not sure what I think about this, Technically combat pod 2 I feel should be a treasure, but I dont think stinger should be changed, stingers are cheese!

[pkk]

Hmm... The Chinese capture a Javelin rocket and use reverse engineering to build a 120mm smoothbore tank gun?!

Sounds unreal, like the idea that capturing LRM Hunter 2 for automatic research of Combat Pod 2. /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" />

[Tontow]

QUOTE (pkk @ Mar 20 2008, 03:00 AM) Hmm... The Chinese capture a Javelin rocket and use reverse engineering to build a 120mm smoothbore tank gun?!

Hmm, take the advance guidance system from the rocket and the advance ballistic knowledge and put it in a barrel.......

[takingarms1]

Also why should rix, one of the most uber factions, get yet another perk?

[Tontow]

Would it really be a perk? Combat pod tech would give LRM tech.

[Camaro]

If you do this, i demand that ALL TECH, ANY THING is stealable and useable by Belters.

That means Belter Hvy BOmbers with forward EW AB cannons/Stingers + AB missles.

[Shizoku]

It's been discussed before. It simplifies the core, it's really not a good idea.

Plus Rix doesn't need anymore perks.