Wiki:System requirements

Discussions about wiki pages
Post Reply
aem
Posts: 1471
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Charlotte, NC

Post by aem »

This is the discussion topic for the wiki article: System Requirements
badpazzword
Posts: 3627
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 8:00 am
Contact:

Post by badpazzword »

QUOTE At least 28.8 KBps modem, 56KBps recommended.[/quote]

I thought Alleg needed 36.6 KBps? Wasn't that the built-in hardcoded limit?
Have gaming questions? Get expert answers! Image Image
pkk
Posts: 5419
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Germany, Munich

Post by pkk »

badpazzword wrote:QUOTE (badpazzword @ Sep 6 2007, 03:16 PM) I thought Alleg needed 36.6 KBps? Wasn't that the built-in hardcoded limit?
Even on the box you find 28.8 kbps... /wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" />
The Escapist (Justin Emerson) @ Dec 21 2010, 02:33 PM:
The history of open-source Allegiance is paved with the bodies of dead code branches, forum flame wars, and personal vendettas. But a community remains because people still love the game.
SpacePenguin

Post by SpacePenguin »

Isn't some of this rather redundant?

For example,

"* Multimedia PC Pentium 200 MHz with 3D card, Multimedia PC Pentium II 266MHz without a 3D card, Multimedia Pentium II PC with 300MHz with 3D card recommended."

It's 2008, FFS! /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" />


I've made a few changes. Revert if necessary.
TheBored
Posts: 4680
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 7:00 am
Location: At my desk staring at my monitor...

Post by TheBored »

Nope, all good /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />

TB

EDIT: Nope is @ whether a revert is needed /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" />
Last edited by TheBored on Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ Nov 28 2008, 02:50 PM) All the retards are contained in one squad mostly (System X)
[18:48] <Imago> dont take me seriously
madpeople
Posts: 4787
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 8:00 am
Location: England

Post by madpeople »

i haven't been keeping up with the vista situation, i believe it works so should probably be included.

may want to put the word "minimum" in front of the system requirements parts ("i don't have a 800*600 monitor, mines 1680*1050, i can't run allegiance as i need 800*600") /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" />
though i think most people could figure it out... do we want the ones who can't?
SpacePenguin

Post by SpacePenguin »

I know my changes might seem a bit pedantic. I appreciate the fact that we have a wiki and I want to help update/clean it up. The "System Requirements" article seemed like an OK place to begin and the easiest thing to NOT screw up. /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" />

Adding "minimum" in the title and "Vista" as one of the OS's would probably be a good idea.

I think I might edit the "Troubleshooting Vista" article next.
TheBored
Posts: 4680
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 7:00 am
Location: At my desk staring at my monitor...

Post by TheBored »

Please do /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />

TB
Image
spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ Nov 28 2008, 02:50 PM) All the retards are contained in one squad mostly (System X)
[18:48] <Imago> dont take me seriously
HSharp
Posts: 5192
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 11:18 am
Location: Brum, UK

Post by HSharp »

Guessing this needs to update for .NET 2.0 requirement for ASGS now?
Image
Image
TheBored
Posts: 4680
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 7:00 am
Location: At my desk staring at my monitor...

Post by TheBored »

HSharp wrote:QUOTE (HSharp @ Mar 4 2009, 11:10 AM) Guessing this needs to update for .NET 2.0 requirement for ASGS now?
Yup, good catch. Should be good now.

TB
Image
spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ Nov 28 2008, 02:50 PM) All the retards are contained in one squad mostly (System X)
[18:48] <Imago> dont take me seriously
Post Reply