Well, this was a good game. It was a freaking hard fought battle to the end.
Weedman is an exceptional commander and I feel honored for having participated in an EVEN game.
People can blame XT for the stack but you can also blame us for even games.
/blink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":o" border="0" alt="blink.gif" /> Yup /wub.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":iluv:" border="0" alt="wub.gif" /> XT /ninja.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":ninja:" border="0" alt="ninja.gif" />
http://asgs.alleg.net/asgsnet/recentgames.aspx?gameid=12819
Not the Problem. The solution.
There's such a THING as a even game?
With all the shouts of "omg stack" you begin to doubt their existence.
With all the shouts of "omg stack" you begin to doubt their existence.
Nans are happy people. They fly around, give out repairs, and overall have a lot of fun. Why are we killing them when we can learn from their example?
On second thought, I loathe my old banner. I want a good one, does that mean I have to work for myself?
On second thought, I loathe my old banner. I want a good one, does that mean I have to work for myself?
I wish all games were similarly balanced...
but it'd make Noir cry to see people on BOTH sides having fun
--TE
but it'd make Noir cry to see people on BOTH sides having fun
--TE
The Allegiance community currently hates their sysadmin because he is doing: [Too Much] [____________|] [Too Little]
Current reason: Removing the PayPal contribute page. Send Bitcoin instead: 1EccFi98tR5S9BYLuB61sFfxKqqgSKK8Yz. This scale updates regularly.
Alright. I have to say that I am my favorite commander to fly for. Next goes Virulence, Weedman, Aarm, Shiz, DrStrangelove... on and on. People NOT on that list are going to be commanding a lot and using the *antistack* button to force me onto thier team so I can *MUTINY* them. I will only play *antistack button* games if there is a *Vote to mutiny* option.
If I am being forced to fly for someone, they should be forced to play better.
If I am being forced to fly for someone, they should be forced to play better.
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.
Even comms = Even game.
Two good experienced comms is preferable.
The problem is when a good commander won't give up the command seat even though no-one of similar quality will face him.
Two average commanders against each other is far, far better than one good comm vs. one weak comm.
Two good experienced comms is preferable.
The problem is when a good commander won't give up the command seat even though no-one of similar quality will face him.
Two average commanders against each other is far, far better than one good comm vs. one weak comm.
spideycw - 'This is because Grav is a huge whining bitch. But we all knew that already' Dec 19 2010, 07:36 PM
You are not forced to fly for anybody whether they use the button or not.
You can choose to fly for either commander as you wish.
The only difference is, just like you can't join Aarm when he is up a player when Imbalance=1, you can't join Aarm if he's stacked and EnforceBalance=on.
If the "balance" button makes it past the senate, that's all that will change.
--TE
You can choose to fly for either commander as you wish.
The only difference is, just like you can't join Aarm when he is up a player when Imbalance=1, you can't join Aarm if he's stacked and EnforceBalance=on.
If the "balance" button makes it past the senate, that's all that will change.
--TE
The Allegiance community currently hates their sysadmin because he is doing: [Too Much] [____________|] [Too Little]
Current reason: Removing the PayPal contribute page. Send Bitcoin instead: 1EccFi98tR5S9BYLuB61sFfxKqqgSKK8Yz. This scale updates regularly.
-
Grimmwolf_GB
- Posts: 3711
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 7:00 am
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
If I am full of myself than so be it. Screw me to the wall if I am against bad commanders being rewarded for sucking.
I think that what all of you on the senate (who actually have a vote that is not a majority but rather a dictatorship) decide that this is a good thing... you will be happier than HELL to see all the pilots who podded you remove themselves from the game.
I will not be told who to fly for ever. Period. never.
Arrogance or not, you cannot MAKE ME fly for you because of a button you have clicked.
Force me to do anything and I am gone.
I think that what all of you on the senate (who actually have a vote that is not a majority but rather a dictatorship) decide that this is a good thing... you will be happier than HELL to see all the pilots who podded you remove themselves from the game.
I will not be told who to fly for ever. Period. never.
Arrogance or not, you cannot MAKE ME fly for you because of a button you have clicked.
Force me to do anything and I am gone.
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.
-
Grimmwolf_GB
- Posts: 3711
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 7:00 am
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
lol.
If you feel misrepresented by the senate, ask your senator to represent your opinion more appropriately. So far it was a simple no. Well, that might be your true opinion, but it is a bad argument.
If you think, I joined the senate to remove all the "good" pilots from the game, you are wrong. I expect to be podded, I am a goddamn htt/bomber/scout/nan/sf/sb pilot, not an int whore. Allegiance does not revolve around dogfighting only.
Balancing wil be optional, there are plenty of servers, where you can command a game with the option turn off, when the game owner decides to enable it. ELO will only count for balanced games, so there is a trade off (but "ELO is broken" anyway).
By the way, I have a list of commanders I will not fly for. I am not too fond of the prospect of flying for them again, the stacked games are worse though.
If you feel misrepresented by the senate, ask your senator to represent your opinion more appropriately. So far it was a simple no. Well, that might be your true opinion, but it is a bad argument.
If you think, I joined the senate to remove all the "good" pilots from the game, you are wrong. I expect to be podded, I am a goddamn htt/bomber/scout/nan/sf/sb pilot, not an int whore. Allegiance does not revolve around dogfighting only.
Balancing wil be optional, there are plenty of servers, where you can command a game with the option turn off, when the game owner decides to enable it. ELO will only count for balanced games, so there is a trade off (but "ELO is broken" anyway).
By the way, I have a list of commanders I will not fly for. I am not too fond of the prospect of flying for them again, the stacked games are worse though.