Free Allegiance Forums

Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Jun 19 2009, 04:14 AM) To elaborate on MrCs post:

Yes


No

Exactly thanks for clarifying

All ranking systems so far have been fail as they have not ranked Fedman as #1

I agree, although apparently this leads to him not hating the developers. Strangeness will out!

spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ Jun 19 2009, 11:35 AM) All ranking systems so far have been fail as they have not ranked Fedman as #1

sgt_baker wrote:QUOTE (sgt_baker @ Jun 19 2009, 01:29 PM) I agree, although apparently this leads to him not hating the developers. Strangeness will out!

And that, my friends, wraps up this entire thread.

I feel that rank is important to measure balanced games, but individuals who spend too much time worrying about it always end up seeming very childish to me. It's kinda like "my dad can beat up your dad" or two little boys behind the house with a tape measure comparing penis sizes. Bottom line is that the game ends the same. unless it's a draw; one team wins, and the other loses. `qk

P.S. My clinical diagnosis for MW never fails to further reinforce itself.

*edit* grammar

All I have to say after skimming the arguing about AS is statistics should be renamed bullcrap.

There is no true randomness, there is physics.

fuzzylunkin1 wrote:QUOTE (fuzzylunkin1 @ Jun 20 2009, 12:28 AM) All I have to say after skimming the arguing about AS is statistics should be renamed bullcrap.

There is no true randomness, there is physics.

Call it what you like. You're never going to contribute anything to the cause of 'more balanced games'.

Despite the dramas and nay-saying, we'll be kicking it oldskool for a while to come.

I'm not nay-saying, just derailing.

Fair beans

AS is just fine. SpideyRank™ has its strengths and weaknesses. Personally, I just think we should get Clay_Pigeon to rank everyone. If PigeonRank™ is good enough for Google...