Where do you see Allegiance...

Sharpshooter · Post by **Sharpshooter** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:03 pm

MrChaos wrote:QUOTE (MrChaos @ Jun 20 2009, 09:49 PM) Be the solution or stfu

I was joking, this dev team is great enough for me!

Cadillac · Post by **Cadillac** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:31 pm

Badp wrote:QUOTE (Badp @ Jun 21 2009, 09:55 AM) Imago's been very active in the last few days in #freeallegiance ( ) to get FAZ5Contrib to build (currently builds fine in VS05, VS08 and VS10, AFAIK) and he found some help to iron out a couple new bugs in the DX code. As far as I can see, he's working hard to bring FAZ Weds back

+1

fuzzylunkin1 · Post by **fuzzylunkin1** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:51 pm

64 Bit Allegiance, here we come!

w0dk4 · Post by **w0dk4** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 4:45 pm

For FAZ Weds to really work, the main lobby has to be SHUT DOWN or REDIRECTED to get the people to actually play the beta for their own's good of playing a better version of Alleg sometime in the future FFS

Deathrender · Post by **Deathrender** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:17 pm

spliffy wrote:QUOTE (spliffy @ Jun 20 2009, 06:42 PM) In ten years we will play alleg on our Iphones .

There won't be Iphones 10 years from now....
With the amount of new stuff apple's coming out with by the time it's 10 years from now we'll be playing alleg on our iHouses

KGJV · Post by **KGJV** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:15 pm

Badp wrote:QUOTE (Badp @ Jun 21 2009, 10:55 AM) Imago's been very active in the last few days in #freeallegiance ( ) to get FAZ5Contrib to build (currently builds fine in VS05, VS08 and VS10, AFAIK) and he found some help to iron out a couple new bugs in the DX code. As far as I can see, he's working hard to bring FAZ Weds back

This is why I woulda banned him from dev team years ago. He's the kind of people I call a 'time eater'. I deal with these kind of ppl every day at work. They are a well-known plague of open source projects. At work, I've adopted a zero-tolerance behavior toward them and it works very well but DB thought differently.
So FAZR5Contrib is Imago's own 'sand box' he created so he wouldn't bother us anymore. The real branch is FAZR5Dev.

And the fact that some of you think is doing stuff or helping is even more dramatic...

badpazzword · Post by **badpazzword** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:38 pm

You know, if you are going to completely disregard that branch can't you just delete it?

If it isn't going to be discarded, it's worth working on it and if it is, it isn't worth the space on the repository or the time everybody Imago included are spending on it.

Thank you.

KGJV · Post by **KGJV** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:51 pm

Badp wrote:QUOTE (Badp @ Jun 21 2009, 10:38 PM) You know, if you are going to completely disregard that branch can't you just delete it?

If it isn't going to be discarded, it's worth working on it and if it is, it isn't worth the space on the repository or the time everybody Imago included are spending on it.

Thank you.

Like I said i'm not in charge. It's not my call nor in my power to do anything about this.

TE & DB know my view on this for years now.

I'm also really astonished that our 'dev team issues' are not publicly known...It's clearly a lack of communication. May be the private dev forum should be 'read only' to everyone.

Zapper · Post by **Zapper** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:19 pm

KGJV wrote:QUOTE (KGJV @ Jun 21 2009, 10:51 PM) I'm also really astonished that our 'dev team issues' are not publicly known...It's clearly a lack of communication. May be the private dev forum should be 'read only' to everyone.

I agree.. on several point which you stated earlier.

i try to read all the forums, when i see your treads i even reply when you ask for help... im sorry if you feel neglected, i never neglect you.

Zapper

SP4WN · Post by **SP4WN** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:43 pm

Badp wrote:QUOTE (Badp @ Jun 21 2009, 09:55 AM) Imago's been very active in the last few days in #freeallegiance ( ) to get FAZ5Contrib to build (currently builds fine in VS05, VS08 and VS10, AFAIK) and he found some help to iron out a couple new bugs in the DX code. As far as I can see, he's working hard to bring FAZ Weds back

KGJV wrote:QUOTE (KGJV @ Jun 21 2009, 09:15 PM) This is why I woulda banned him from dev team years ago. He's the kind of people I call a 'time eater'. I deal with these kind of ppl every day at work. They are a well-known plague of open source projects. At work, I've adopted a zero-tolerance behavior toward them and it works very well but DB thought differently.
So FAZR5Contrib is Imago's own 'sand box' he created so he wouldn't bother us anymore. The real branch is FAZR5Dev.

And the fact that some of you think is doing stuff or helping is even more dramatic...

I find the fact you calling the only Dev I see, you have out in the public actually doing stuff and getting people interested in testing, quite dramatic too.

I personally stopped beta testing a long time ago due to pretty much the same reason you dont want to dev anymore, I cant code for @#(!, so I helped by testing.

Imago is working things out and has been doing for longer than a few days, I have helped test a few things and he has also got a few people involved again with testing, I seriously dont see a problem with you thinking he is a time-sink, its "his" time he is using and he is still contributing to a better Allegiance, I would personally never knock a guy for that.