Broodwich wrote:QUOTE (Broodwich @ Nov 13 2008, 11:13 PM) The reason belters win is because people dont play offensively enough against them and let them mine tons of he while trying to compete for most kills. Then they bitch about how belters are overpowered
I wouldn't say this is entirely true, but I do agree to a point. I comanded a game a few days ago as belters, and the other side won because they rushed bombers - The other commander, Strike700@PK, said after the game that if he hadn't rushed bombers like that, I would have won in 5 more minutes because I would have had my Tac going.
spidey that's just stupid. Unless of course you mean that by the time the other team can AFFORD hvyints that you don't have sfs/figs AND ints up.
Otherwise you're just letting them have settings. Just because they can afford it doesn't mean they have it. Whereas belters likely can afford it too, they just need the research to cook. 4 mins is not long, 10 mins is long.
As for what cost changes, just go incremental, not saying take out the whole cost perk.
MadAccountant wrote:QUOTE (MadAccountant @ Nov 14 2008, 03:03 PM)
spidey that's just stupid. Unless of course you mean that by the time the other team can AFFORD hvyints that you don't have sfs/figs AND ints up.
spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ Nov 13 2008, 08:59 AM) If we even think of giving a Belters cost nerf I hope we lower their research time. As it is someone could afford heavy ints before you even get figs/ints/sfs up
Hopefully this clarifies what I am saying. If it doesnt I am at a loss because size 7 is as large a font as we have.
I'm sorry I don't remember any of it. For you the day spideycw graced your squad with utter destruction was the most important day of your life. But for me, it was Sunday
Idanmel wrote:QUOTE (Idanmel @ Mar 19 2012, 05:54 AM) I am ashamed for all the drama I caused, I have much to learn on how to behave when things don't go my way.
Nope, I don't think it really speaks to the problem at all. If you think it does then what about TF and bios? Another way to look at this is that you say "AS IT IS" (I won't even use large font) and yet belters still own. So yes the theoretical problem exists but the empirical data doesn't support it.
Bios and TF are supposed to be in that boat because they have by far the strongest ADV Tech(cheapest too for bios which allows you to dual tech easily) in my opinion.
Does not the empirical data support Belters should actually be buffed since it has the lowest win percentage of any faction?
I'm sorry I don't remember any of it. For you the day spideycw graced your squad with utter destruction was the most important day of your life. But for me, it was Sunday
Idanmel wrote:QUOTE (Idanmel @ Mar 19 2012, 05:54 AM) I am ashamed for all the drama I caused, I have much to learn on how to behave when things don't go my way.
Old data. Will make a live version once AS 1.0 has been implemented.
Edit: Next version will likely be normalised for stackage too.
Edit2: The reason I don't have bang-up-to-date data is that we're now talking about moving GBs of information in and out of ASGS. TE is working on a solution to the problem which will alleviate the stress on the ASGS server. Soon™.
Last edited by sgt_baker on Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Granary Sergeant Baker - Special Bread Service (Wurf - 13th Oct 2011)
spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ Nov 14 2008, 08:19 PM) Hopefully this clarifies what I am saying. If it doesnt I am at a loss because size 7 is as large a font as we have.
