Page 4 of 6
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:34 am
by guitarism
Both would be a better thing.
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:30 pm
by Adept
juckto wrote:QUOTE (juckto @ Feb 19 2009, 01:55 AM) Fixed.
Nothing about the int's "design" indicates to me that it was designed for hunting. Its lack of ripcord, low cruising speed, and its pathetic scan indicates the opposite.
As per usual Juckto can actually put to words what I was trying to say.
Exactly. Boosts towards prey and blast it to bits with miniguns - that is an interceptor. Sneaking around to ambush things, leave that to stealth figs.
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:15 pm
by Sealer
Gappy wrote:QUOTE (Gappy @ Feb 19 2009, 02:18 AM) I'd rather see their fuel lowered a bit myself, but an increase to 125% sig would also go a long way.
Me likes.
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:30 pm
by hartzaden
yes there sig needs to be rased
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:16 pm
by Dorjan
Their sig needs raising, fuel decreased and damage increased!
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:52 pm
by Sealer
Dorjan wrote:QUOTE (Dorjan @ Feb 26 2009, 03:16 PM) Their sig needs raising, fuel decreased and damage increased!
Yes, miniguns are way too weak atm. I suggest 50 % increase of damage to each minigun and some more ammo, too!
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:08 pm
by Dorjan
and missiles! Yeah!
+ they need prox too!
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:09 pm
by badpazzword
AB2 ints!
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 5:18 pm
by Dorjan
Don't be crazy bp!
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 5:20 pm
by HSharp
We need int bombers! Sup has fig bombers, tac has stealth bombers, its only logical to have int bombers