Page 2 of 7
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:23 am
by Zapper
madpeople wrote:QUOTE (madpeople @ Feb 6 2007, 10:05 PM) 0.o it wasn't that ugly was it? ok i hadn't checked how big it was (# of kb), but it was less than 1 mb, so its not so bad.
not complaining, just thought it was interesting you removed the img tags
I just altered the presentation, its rude to force users to DL a BIG picture and use Bandwidth.
And for some reason i dont get a "write reason for edit" when i edit your post, so that's why u get an answer, now that u ask.
Zapper
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:37 am
by madpeople
madpeople wrote:QUOTE (madpeople @ Feb 6 2007, 09:05 PM) ok i hadn't checked how big it was (# of kb), but it was less than 1 mb, so its not so bad.
*shrugs* i've seen bigger pictures posted
what max size do you think they should be?
ok, i suppose it was quite big (kb) for its size (px)
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:13 pm
by mesial
Bandwidth?
<---15MB T1 line here /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:38 am
by Jormagund
So I have been making a fair number of sigs recently... sp4wn I was pretty sure yours was next on my list /sad.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":sad:" border="0" alt="sad.gif" />
and uh... 480x108 seems to be working as a rule of thumb. BUT, crafty pointed out today that RojoMojo and Grimmwolf had larger sigs... visibly larger and when mine was larger it didn't seem to get the size reduction... do *supporters* get bigger sig space?
Just curious
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:09 pm
by madpeople
supporters don't get more space.
the max size is 400*100 and 100kb
it has been stated that they allow a little leeway, but if they were feeling nasty they could say your 1 px over the 100 px limit, please fix your sig or have it removed
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:42 pm
by batman
Me wants someone to make me a better sig. and /wub.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":iluv:" border="0" alt="wub.gif" /> Shiz /wub.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":iluv:" border="0" alt="wub.gif" /> -- don't get any ideas. /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:46 pm
by Zapper
@signatures
The 548 signatures are not compremising a 800 width screen.
It all comes down to the fact that the use of signatures are about freedom with resposability.
My signature is made so im able to place it in any forum without pressing this limit.
Zapper
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:25 pm
by SP4WN
Jormagund wrote:QUOTE (Jormagund @ Feb 10 2007, 03:38 AM) So I have been making a fair number of sigs recently... sp4wn I was pretty sure yours was next on my list /sad.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":sad:" border="0" alt="sad.gif" />
and uh... 480x108 seems to be working as a rule of thumb. BUT, crafty pointed out today that RojoMojo and Grimmwolf had larger sigs... visibly larger and when mine was larger it didn't seem to get the size reduction... do *supporters* get bigger sig space?
Just curious
Hey Mjol, do you like ma new sig?
Heres another one i made for l8r....
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:29 pm
by Jormagund
Yes, they're coming along very nicely- looks like that third one is the best so far! You should take a pic of one of the ships in game. Target what you want a pic of and press f10 then you use your arrow keys and thrust keys and f3 zoom keys to get the perfet angle- then press screenshot and go to gimp, open a new file, and *paste.* Enjoy /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:37 am
by Adaven
Or you could use mdlview and look at anyship, any angle, any time.