Herein lies the great unasked question of the past sixteen years.Papsmear wrote:QUOTE (Papsmear @ Apr 14 2017, 12:52 PM) Politically there is really nothing to be gained by supporting the Syrian rebels so ask yourself why the US supports them?
On 9/11 the US was attacked by fundamentalist Sunni terrorists. In the years since then Madrid, Bali, London (twice and a third failed attempt), Mumbai, Paris (twice), Nice and more than a few other places have been attacked by fundamentalist Sunni terrorists, killing many innocents each time.
However the record of major Western intervention since 9/11 is as follows:
Afghanistan - failed state, attempted removal of Taliban
Iraq - largely secular / Arab nationalist state, removal of Saddam
Somalia - failed state, removal of the ICU
Libya - largely secular / Arab nationalist state, removal of Gaddafi
Syria - largely secular / Arab nationalist state, ongoing vs Assad
Islamic State - fundamentalist Sunni state, ongoing vs IS
Yemen - Shia / Arab nationalist state, ongoing vs Houthis
We have also made serious attempts at destabilizing the Shia-led Iran - attempts which in some cases (stuxnet and the assassination of atomic scientists especially) would be acts of war if ever done by someone else to us. There is also continual talk of war with Orthodox Christian and nationalist Russia because (and solely because) of their support of Assad in Syria. Our allies in the region (especially Turkey, but also the Saudis) have openly co-operated with and armed some very dangerous people indeed.
Why are we doing any of this?