Squad League Feb 22nd Games!
-
ChaoticStorm
- Posts: 894
- Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:38 pm
- Location: .
I'd like to lodge a complaint:
Based on the squad schedule, Xexy starts with a bye and then next week is slated to go against @Iron. Considering @Iron's turnout yesterday (2/15) this is starting to look like Xexy has been given two bye weeks in a row, meaning that for us it'll be more than a month before we can actually play in the tournament.
So far, @Iron has played in exactly 1 squadgame (in which I believe they had to pull mercs) and for the only other game they have had scheduled so far proceeded to show 0 pilots. What kind of assurances do we have from @Iron that they will actually show up for any of the league games? And why does @Xexy have to bear the brunt of having both the first week bye and following that up with a game which, by all indications, will be a forfeit by @Iron?
EDIT: To bring my complaint into sharper focus, please look at the list of pilots @Iron fielded in their first squadgame:
http://www.freeallegiance.org/forums/index...st&p=688262
of them, Dibbley was a day-of recruit, Tuckins is also squadded with Element (and spends most of his time in an @Elem tag) and Everywhere is not, to my knowledge, on their roster (and is also @Elem). From their opening game roster, @Iron has shown an average of 3-4 pilots who are members of their squad per game.
I respect giving Fedman another chance, I really do, but I'm feeling kicked in the stomach by this schedule.
Based on the squad schedule, Xexy starts with a bye and then next week is slated to go against @Iron. Considering @Iron's turnout yesterday (2/15) this is starting to look like Xexy has been given two bye weeks in a row, meaning that for us it'll be more than a month before we can actually play in the tournament.
So far, @Iron has played in exactly 1 squadgame (in which I believe they had to pull mercs) and for the only other game they have had scheduled so far proceeded to show 0 pilots. What kind of assurances do we have from @Iron that they will actually show up for any of the league games? And why does @Xexy have to bear the brunt of having both the first week bye and following that up with a game which, by all indications, will be a forfeit by @Iron?
EDIT: To bring my complaint into sharper focus, please look at the list of pilots @Iron fielded in their first squadgame:
http://www.freeallegiance.org/forums/index...st&p=688262
of them, Dibbley was a day-of recruit, Tuckins is also squadded with Element (and spends most of his time in an @Elem tag) and Everywhere is not, to my knowledge, on their roster (and is also @Elem). From their opening game roster, @Iron has shown an average of 3-4 pilots who are members of their squad per game.
I respect giving Fedman another chance, I really do, but I'm feeling kicked in the stomach by this schedule.
Last edited by zombywoof on Mon Feb 16, 2015 7:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Don't find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain.
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Apr 1 2009, 09:35 PM) But I don't read the forums I only post.
-
ChaoticStorm
- Posts: 894
- Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:38 pm
- Location: .
-
Malicious Wraith
- Posts: 3170
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:51 am
Second complaint:
Fedman doesn't believe that his inability to field a full squad in either of the games he's played is relevant to the question of whether or not his "squad" should be considered a squad and included in the tournament. He doesn't feel the need to apologize for not showing up at all to a squadgame (even to say, "sorry, we're not going to make it").
Fedman doesn't believe that his inability to field a full squad in either of the games he's played is relevant to the question of whether or not his "squad" should be considered a squad and included in the tournament. He doesn't feel the need to apologize for not showing up at all to a squadgame (even to say, "sorry, we're not going to make it").
Don't find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain.
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Apr 1 2009, 09:35 PM) But I don't read the forums I only post.
I agree with P1.
Rules are there for a reason.
Put up or shut up is the rule and @Iron didn't show what takes to be a squad!
People devote precious time to come to SGs and don't need enemy that doesn't show up.
Rules are there for a reason.
Put up or shut up is the rule and @Iron didn't show what takes to be a squad!
People devote precious time to come to SGs and don't need enemy that doesn't show up.
- "History repeats itself for a reason" - "It's easy to cry for war when you've never experienced it" - "It's better to negotiate for 10 years then make war for 10 days" - "The strong do as they will, and the weak do as they must"
-
TheAlaskan
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 2:15 am
- Location: Denver, CO
-
Malicious Wraith
- Posts: 3170
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:51 am