Libyan rebels capture parts of tripoli

Non-Allegiance related. High probability of spam. Pruned regularly.
Post Reply
germloucks
Posts: 756
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Seattle

Post by germloucks »

Looks like the rebels have finally neared the finish line. Although i had mixed feelings about whether or not to deploy ground forces in Libya, i think that the rebels paying for the end of the ghadaffi regime with their own blood makes more sense.

Wonder how long it will take for them to take complete control of Tripoli? Then the interesting question of who will come to power next....
Camaro
Posts: 2418
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 8:00 am

Post by Camaro »

Its interesting to watch, however I feel even our limited involvement in controlling airspace was intervening too much on our part.
Image
Image
DasSmiter
Posts: 3820
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma

Post by DasSmiter »

They did it so that they'll have pressure on the next government with a friendly eye
ImageImageImage
Get over yourselves, don't try to win arguments on the internet where the option of a punch in the mouth is unavailable
"It is not that I cannot create anything good, but that I will not." And to prove this, he created the peacock.
Broodwich
Posts: 5662
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:48 am
Location: Raincity

Post by Broodwich »

germloucks wrote:QUOTE (germloucks @ Aug 21 2011, 05:17 PM) Then the interesting question of who will come to power next....
probably some psycho who will give euros plenty of oil discount
QUOTE Drizzo: ha ha good old chap
Drizzo: i am a brit
Drizzo: tut tut
Drizzo: wankarrrrrr
Drizzo: i only have sex whilst in the missionary position[/quote] Fas est et ab hoste doceri - Ovid
Camaro
Posts: 2418
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 8:00 am

Post by Camaro »

DasSmiter wrote:QUOTE (DasSmiter @ Aug 21 2011, 02:49 PM) They did it so that they'll have pressure on the next government with a friendly eye
And so the cycle continues.

This is precisely why we need to butt out of international politics and conflicts.
Image
Image
MrChaos
Posts: 8352
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 8:00 am

Post by MrChaos »

The secular side of things is getting severely out played by the jihaadist side of the rebels. Or they can all sit down and make a country that is beneficial to all with wide spread freedom in all forms they find acceptable... This isn't the first "Arab spring" I think the outcome wiill be religious repression rather then despot repression. Its the $#@!ing oil money that doesn't give the citizens a chance to find their own way of governing.

tl;dr You just might just wish for crazy old $#@! moe-moe back in a few years.
Ssssh
spideycw
Posts: 7512
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 7:00 am

Post by spideycw »

dunno about the rest of you all but I don't much care about this considering the state of my own country.
I'm sorry I don't remember any of it. For you the day spideycw graced your squad with utter destruction was the most important day of your life. But for me, it was Sunday
Idanmel wrote:QUOTE (Idanmel @ Mar 19 2012, 05:54 AM) I am ashamed for all the drama I caused, I have much to learn on how to behave when things don't go my way.

My apologies.
germloucks
Posts: 756
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Seattle

Post by germloucks »

Well camaro, the rebellion would have surely failed if we hadnt provided support. Im sure we had special forces on the ground organizing and arming the rebels, that much is obvious from media reports.

It ultimately comes down to a utilitarian point of view for me. Did we do more good than harm? I think so here. (not so much in iraq/afghanistan) It was well within our power to positively influence a country of 6 million people towards change. Did we do the right thing? People seem to be happy today, and hopefully things will look brighter in the future

Libya has a big advantage afghanistan never will, the country is much more industrialized (by comparison) therefore better educated as a whole and has natural resources that can fund more than just a brutal dictator's eccentric whims.

Also, most of the current regime officials have slunk over to the rebels with their tails between their legs, much like many of the baathists did. which is another good sign.

hopefully, with the rapport we gained from arming the rebels, we can positively and discretely shape a better government than they had.
Last edited by germloucks on Mon Aug 22, 2011 3:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Camaro
Posts: 2418
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 8:00 am

Post by Camaro »

germloucks wrote:QUOTE (germloucks @ Aug 21 2011, 06:36 PM) Well camaro, the rebellion would have surely failed if we hadnt provided support. Im sure we had special forces on the ground organizing and arming the rebels, that much is obvious from media reports.
Fine, let Britain, France, Germany, Russia, China, WHOEVER do whatever they want to intervene. All I'm saying is that the United States of America should butt out of others politics and tend to our own issues at home. While we are at it we should bring our troops home and close our overseas military bases.
Image
Image
Vanaka
Posts: 102
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 8:00 am
Location: The Unknown

Post by Vanaka »

germloucks wrote:QUOTE (germloucks @ Aug 21 2011, 10:36 PM) hopefully, with the rapport we gained from arming the rebels, we can positively and discretely shape a better government than they had.
Haven't we tried that before?

You 'know, with Saddam Hussein? or was that Osama Bin Laden? Can't remember. Anyway, this just seems like history repeating itself.
Last edited by Vanaka on Mon Aug 22, 2011 5:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Only YOU can prevent forum trollings!
Post Reply