Allegiance Maintenance

Froggy · Post by **Froggy** » Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:56 am

JimmyNighthawk wrote:QUOTE (JimmyNighthawk @ Dec 15 2006, 07:31 PM) Newbie(0) Time!!! : n i n j a :

no one cares about you anyways Jimmy. I'm int he same boat so.. Let's go sailing

Ozricosis · Post by **Ozricosis** » Sat Dec 16, 2006 7:03 pm

Fix the ranks or turn them off until they are fixed. Thanks.

Oz

Post by **Tigereye** » Sat Dec 16, 2006 10:10 pm

The ranks will take about a month or so to fix once TAG is back to normal.

I think TAG is fixed now though - I haven't seen one problem since it's been back up.

--TE

Ozricosis · Post by **Ozricosis** » Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:10 am

So for one month we get to deal with people being either a (15) or a (0)? Please say that's not the case.

General_Freak · Post by **General_Freak** » Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:31 am

Don't worry, I'm a 14 already. /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" />

Grimmwolf_GB · Post by **Grimmwolf_GB** » Sun Dec 17, 2006 4:00 am

Tigereye wrote:QUOTE (Tigereye @ Dec 16 2006, 11:10 PM) The ranks will take about a month or so to fix once TAG is back to normal.

I think TAG is fixed now though - I haven't seen one problem since it's been back up.

--TE

The recent games pages begs do differ. I still see the weird "new Commander".

Post by **Pook** » Sun Dec 17, 2006 4:10 am

Tiger updated it and sent it to me, but I was out most of the day and it just posted.

Froggy · Post by **Froggy** » Sun Dec 17, 2006 6:01 am

Growing pains ppl.. Relax..

-Froggy

Post by **Pook** » Mon Dec 18, 2006 5:07 am

Ozricosis wrote:QUOTE (Ozricosis @ Dec 16 2006, 06:10 PM) So for one month we get to deal with people being either a (15) or a (0)? Please say that's not the case.

We'll use simple age-based ranks until enough data has accumulated to give us a rough starting point.

Raindog · Post by **Raindog** » Mon Dec 18, 2006 5:18 am

Are the age based ranks going to be a starting point for ELO or simply a replacement until ELO gains some semblance of accuracy? I'd suggest using them as a starting point and let ELO adjust from there. Since the age ranks have some value, they should at least be statistically closer to a person's true ELO value, giving ELO a nice headstart. This might also let us move on to a commander weighted system faster since a reasonably accurate ELo system is a prerequisite for that. Excellent work!