Tourney Day 2

Front page items.
Striker
Posts: 2444
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 8:00 am
Contact:

Post by Striker »

Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Sep 27 2010, 07:59 AM) The ranking order was: SysX, PK, RT, XT, BS, ACE, SRM, GB, SF in descending order.
SF was dead last? Seriously? :glare: I know we've had a rough 6 months, but wow. :P
--------------------------------------------
Governing Latin America by the beach with sandals, socks, shorts, multi-colored balloons, and an iron fist since 2006.
Grimmwolf_GB
Posts: 3711
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Grimmwolf_GB »

After the last tournament, I was surprised to see GB on the 8th spot.
Striker
Posts: 2444
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 8:00 am
Contact:

Post by Striker »

Grimmwolf_GB wrote:QUOTE (Grimmwolf_GB @ Sep 28 2010, 01:26 AM) After the last tournament, I was surprised to see GB on the 8th spot.
Someone should be tarred and feathered. This travesty regarding ranks should never have happened! lmao :iluv:


EDIT:
Clarification ftw
Last edited by Striker on Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
--------------------------------------------
Governing Latin America by the beach with sandals, socks, shorts, multi-colored balloons, and an iron fist since 2006.
badpazzword
Posts: 3627
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 8:00 am
Contact:

Post by badpazzword »

We're a game away from 4th place so I'm not complaining :biggrin:
Have gaming questions? Get expert answers! Image Image
Grimmwolf_GB
Posts: 3711
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Grimmwolf_GB »

I am wondering, why do GB and SRM have the longest route to the finals? (6 compared to XT's 4)? Is there a logic behind it? SRM and GB are not ranked last, XT not first...
Raveen
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Birmingham, UK
Contact:

Post by Raveen »

SysX, PK, SF, RT, GB, XT and SRM all have a route of 5 wins to claim the top spot. ACE and BS have one extra game.

So I'm not sure what you're asking Grimm. If you mean from this point on it's because GB and SRM lost in the first week and XT lost in the second.
ImageImage
Spidey: Can't think of a reason I'd need to know anything
Grimmwolf_GB
Posts: 3711
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Grimmwolf_GB »

Oh, never mind. I missed the first game by GB, but I can't find the first game by SRM on sept 19th. Did they forfeit?
Anyway, sorry for being confused.
Striker
Posts: 2444
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 8:00 am
Contact:

Post by Striker »

Grimmwolf_GB wrote:QUOTE (Grimmwolf_GB @ Sep 28 2010, 12:29 PM) Oh, never mind. I missed the first game by GB, but I can't find the first game by SRM on sept 19th. Did they forfeit?
Anyway, sorry for being confused.
According to the OC SRM did indeed forfeit.
--------------------------------------------
Governing Latin America by the beach with sandals, socks, shorts, multi-colored balloons, and an iron fist since 2006.
badpazzword
Posts: 3627
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 8:00 am
Contact:

Post by badpazzword »

I was present at the start of the game and SRM did field 10 people with the tag, albeit after the 15 minutes' mark. I hence considered GB v SRM as a game proper.
Have gaming questions? Get expert answers! Image Image
Hermit
Posts: 1322
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 9:20 am
Location: outside society

Post by Hermit »

As far as I know if the other team agrees to give some few extra minutes out of sportmanship the game is to be considered valid.
Image
Image
Post Reply