new weapon, ramkill

Development area for FreeAllegiance's Community Core.
deathgoat
Posts: 517
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:50 am
Location: beyond the permafrost

Post by deathgoat »

so mis-interpreting another thread, i though of the idea of a mountable bayonet style weapon - ramkill FTW!

probably most useful on ints, mount it in one of the gun slots and it can increase your ram damage... very useful vs miners, bbrs, htts, etc....


not sure of the implementation, just throwing this idead out there
Image
pkk
Posts: 5419
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Germany, Munich

Post by pkk »

code change...
The Escapist (Justin Emerson) @ Dec 21 2010, 02:33 PM:
The history of open-source Allegiance is paved with the bodies of dead code branches, forum flame wars, and personal vendettas. But a community remains because people still love the game.
Valiance
Posts: 561
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 4:06 pm

Post by Valiance »

And apparently if you just increase the mass of a ship enough to kill other ships easily, because ram damage isn't affected by damage classes, it can potentially do ridiculous damage to bases as well.
ImageImage
Imago
Posts: 1440
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Contact:

Post by Imago »

enhancement ticket

new weapon class "melee"

http://alleg.scarybugs.net

:iluv:
Image

These bugs haven't been fixed yet because don't have any developers interested in fixing them up. --Tigereye
Imago's stupid-sensor is supersensitive. --RealPandemonium
The art is managing the flow of the drama to achieve the desired results. --Big_Beta_Tester
joeld wrote:But we’ve been amazed at the level to which some of the Allegiance fans have remained hard-core.
madpeople
Posts: 4787
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 8:00 am
Location: England

Post by madpeople »

If you have a rapid fire weapon with a very small range, and maybe AOE damage. then you effectivly end up with a cutting tourch which would only deal damage when you're practically touching the enemy...

If it were an energy weapon that used most of the energy of the ship so you only get to fire off say half a seconds worth, or one or two shots with a larger AOE then you would have to click fire jsut as you were about to ram them to get max damage.

Could use a ramming booster, since I think some of the damage is based on the mass of the ramming ship, and boosters can affect mass.
Last edited by madpeople on Sat Mar 20, 2010 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Imago
Posts: 1440
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Contact:

Post by Imago »

you can do it any number of ways.
we have the source code.

Step 1) identify the BEST way you think it should work.

Step 2) enter ticket describing enhancement in detail.

Step 3) close ticket.

Step 4) profit?
Image

These bugs haven't been fixed yet because don't have any developers interested in fixing them up. --Tigereye
Imago's stupid-sensor is supersensitive. --RealPandemonium
The art is managing the flow of the drama to achieve the desired results. --Big_Beta_Tester
joeld wrote:But we’ve been amazed at the level to which some of the Allegiance fans have remained hard-core.
Adaven
Posts: 1959
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Greater Ozarks

Post by Adaven »

Valiance wrote:QUOTE (Valiance @ Mar 20 2010, 09:46 AM) And apparently if you just increase the mass of a ship enough to kill other ships easily, because ram damage isn't affected by damage classes, it can potentially do ridiculous damage to bases as well.
No, ram damage is affected by DC (its either the first or last one, haven't looked at ICE lately), but the values are all currently set to 1 (except asteroids), so damage to a ship = damage to a base. It defines how much damage an armor class receives when it gets hit. Just set station hull types to recieve less damage from collisions (asteroids are already set to 0).

Does mass even affect damage anyway? I thought it was more hitpoints and speed in the code for damage, and mass just affected how far you push something.

So, you can make a ship that does more ram damage (and survives itself) like this:

- Hvy Int with super high hitpoints (could be done as hull or with a "shield" if you wanted it as a mountable object for regular ships). This creates the damage on the opponents.
- Assign New armor class to int (or shield) that has low collision modifier (so it doesn't always suicide), and is super weak against all weapons so that it can be shot down like normal.
- Tweak Base collision damage as mentioned above to keep your stations alive.

Likewise, you can also tweak things so that a ship is incredibly vulnerable to ramming yet resistant to normal weapons.

Also, KB does effect ram damage as well.
Last edited by Adaven on Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
juckto
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 7:00 am
Location: NZ

Post by juckto »

I tried creating a ship with high hitpoints and high mass to act as a 'ram ship' in my core. It worked, except when either ship had a shield. In that case, the damage calculations were thrown off and the target just bounced halfway across the sector.

Also, the total ram damage was asymptotic. After a certain point, having more mass and/or hitpoints will not allow you to deal any more ram damage.

@Adaven, mass does affect it because the damage is based on change in speed.
Last edited by juckto on Sat Mar 20, 2010 7:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Usually though, "skill" is used to covertly mean "match the game exactly to my level of competence." Anyone who is at all worse than me should fail utterly (and humorously!) and anyone better is clearly too caught up in the game and their opinions shouldn't count.
IB_
Posts: 1651
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 3:11 am

Post by IB_ »

I've already ram killed a @#(!load of miners.
slap wrote:QUOTE (slap @ Oct 7 2009, 01:28 AM) good point, I concede.
Hellsyng
Posts: 929
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:50 pm

Post by Hellsyng »

IB_ wrote:QUOTE (IB_ @ Mar 20 2010, 03:39 PM) I've already ram killed a @#(!load of miners.
+1
MastaMetz wrote:QUOTE (MastaMetz @ Dec 6, 2012, 10:32 PM)@#(!ternet. I'm a genius!
Post Reply