"ASGS polls" as in they appear upon loggin in game? I don't see them (nor I see anything up on the forums)
FAO Homepage Updated
http://www.thegamersoffice.com/Dorjan/bacon2
a 3rd contender (which is unfinished but Is completing as you watch, please note the background is still the beta one. We never decided on a good background as this one finishes poorly for widescreens and is too large.)
this is Bacons/sp4wns design, Bacons writing with my coding.
Nothing is fixed and all is pending approval.
a 3rd contender (which is unfinished but Is completing as you watch, please note the background is still the beta one. We never decided on a good background as this one finishes poorly for widescreens and is too large.)
this is Bacons/sp4wns design, Bacons writing with my coding.
Nothing is fixed and all is pending approval.
Last edited by Dorjan on Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
I decided to relive the days gone by in my new blog.
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Jan 31 2012, 03:09 PM) True story.
Except the big about dorjan being jelly, that's just spidey's ego.
.
ACS grad since 2nd Feb. 2010Hehe, barf.
Sorry, let me qualify that more:
Objectively BAD stuff: Embedded CSS, Inline styles, inline javascript, tons of layout tables, two 404s caused by missing images, total on-load footprint of almost a megabyte (!!!), 99% of which is images which could be compressed a ton, no gzip compression, no expires headers, poorly configured ETags, over 42 requests on pageload. (Note, I have not even done browser compatibility testing)
Subjectively BAD stuff: Crappy images (page looks like it came right out of 1999, the old design was way better - gj pook), inconsistent menu system (beneath video).
Good stuff: More info is good.
1. Yes
2. Neither.
Sorry, let me qualify that more:
Objectively BAD stuff: Embedded CSS, Inline styles, inline javascript, tons of layout tables, two 404s caused by missing images, total on-load footprint of almost a megabyte (!!!), 99% of which is images which could be compressed a ton, no gzip compression, no expires headers, poorly configured ETags, over 42 requests on pageload. (Note, I have not even done browser compatibility testing)
Subjectively BAD stuff: Crappy images (page looks like it came right out of 1999, the old design was way better - gj pook), inconsistent menu system (beneath video).
Good stuff: More info is good.
1. Yes
2. Neither.
Last edited by Orion on Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'll say it again . ..this page is da best:).
Dorjan wrote:QUOTE (Dorjan @ Feb 8 2010, 04:56 PM) http://www.thegamersoffice.com/Dorjan/bacon2
a 3rd contender (which is unfinished but Is completing as you watch)
this is Bacons/sp4wns design, Bacons writing with my coding.
Nothing is fixed and all is pending approval.
I think this one is the best:
http://www.freeallegiance.org/forums/index...st&p=443580
Also, bacon's looks terrible in IE6 due to PNG transparency issues... so that's 11% of people, statistically speaking (dont know the actual stats for this site)
http://www.freeallegiance.org/forums/index...st&p=443580
Also, bacon's looks terrible in IE6 due to PNG transparency issues... so that's 11% of people, statistically speaking (dont know the actual stats for this site)
Last edited by Orion on Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
I agree I think Space Junk's is the best. Simple and elegant with a video to boot.Orion wrote:QUOTE (Orion @ Feb 8 2010, 07:03 PM) I think this one is the best:
http://www.freeallegiance.org/forums/index...st&p=443580
Also, bacon's looks terrible in IE6 due to PNG transparency issues... so that's 11% of people, statistically speaking (dont know the actual stats for this site)
I'm sorry I don't remember any of it. For you the day spideycw graced your squad with utter destruction was the most important day of your life. But for me, it was Sunday
Idanmel wrote:QUOTE (Idanmel @ Mar 19 2012, 05:54 AM) I am ashamed for all the drama I caused, I have much to learn on how to behave when things don't go my way.
My apologies.
Video on my page has been updated. Also if you haven't read my posts about my page here is some info about the embedded videos:
"I have a YouTube playlist embedded in my page and following the trailer will be additional videos which explain Allegiance in more detail. Most Likely I'd have a 3-5 minute vid following it which would probably walk a viewer through a typical game and show all elements of Allegiance with narration explaining what is going on. Obviously the whole game wouldn't be shown, but bits and pieces would. Also I'd have single videos on different aspects of the game such as commanding, etc. Others could use my vids as well of course though."
Personally I like Dorjan's new Bacon/SP4WN a lot better than the old Bacon page.
"I have a YouTube playlist embedded in my page and following the trailer will be additional videos which explain Allegiance in more detail. Most Likely I'd have a 3-5 minute vid following it which would probably walk a viewer through a typical game and show all elements of Allegiance with narration explaining what is going on. Obviously the whole game wouldn't be shown, but bits and pieces would. Also I'd have single videos on different aspects of the game such as commanding, etc. Others could use my vids as well of course though."
Personally I like Dorjan's new Bacon/SP4WN a lot better than the old Bacon page.
Last edited by aem on Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
