SY vs Exp

Mastametz · Post by **Mastametz** » Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:43 pm

IMO Super Heavy class should obscenely expensive and only counterable by an opposing team of super heavy class.

NightRychune · Post by **NightRychune** » Sun Dec 27, 2009 11:47 pm

If we're going to go around and around with this bull@#(! about "well it's powerful but it's really expensive but once you get it it will guarantee victory" then we might as well just start turning prosperity on all the time, because it's really the same thing.

Post by **zombywoof** » Mon Dec 28, 2009 5:57 am

Mastametz wrote:QUOTE (Mastametz @ Dec 27 2009, 12:43 PM) IMO Super Heavy class should obscenely expensive and only counterable by an opposing team of super heavy class.

The issue I have is that it is a) not obscenely expensive and b) is mainly counterable by either super heavy class or sup, in a metagame where sup is dominant for many other reasons as well.

IANF · Post by **IANF** » Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:41 pm

Psychosis wrote:QUOTE (Psychosis @ Dec 23 2009, 04:47 PM) i agree, but on a side note, we did stop 2 cruisers with mini3 rix ints via massed swarm tactics, they however had 0 nans

actualy we did have nans. they just weren't naning well. (i remember cause i was in a turret)