banned?

Broodwich · Post by **Broodwich** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 6:09 am

we have waited 30 times as long for fed to launch a game, im sure you could have waited an extra little bit

Shizoku · Post by **Shizoku** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 6:20 am

No Brood, you see bucket called his squadmate a bad comm. That shortens the time you have to wait to ban someone.

Bad bucket! Trying to get a good game going between two more evenly matched comms is a terrible offense!

Orion · Post by **Orion** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 6:58 am

Shizoku wrote:QUOTE (Shizoku @ Dec 24 2009, 12:20 AM) No Brood, you see bucket called his squadmate a bad comm. That shortens the time you have to wait to ban someone.

Bad bucket! Trying to get a good game going between two more evenly matched comms is a terrible offense!

Ooh, should have waited for someone else to make that connection, otherwise it just makes it look like you're sticking up for your squad mate.

@#(!, I should have waited for someone else to make that connection, now it just looks like I'm sticking up for my squadmate

(For the record, I am against frivolous bans, but I'm willing to give FB the benefit of the doubt)

theTroy · Post by **theTroy** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 7:30 am

Reading the finger's post I see _NO_ indication of a warning whatsoever. Honestly, if it was me in that place, I would not have a clue that I have been warned either. Just as I wouldnt do anything about it, since its VERY common for anyone to just "ask" "tell" etc to hand over the commplace.

MrChaos · Post by **MrChaos** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 7:45 am

theTroy wrote:QUOTE (theTroy @ Dec 24 2009, 01:30 AM) Reading the finger's post I see _NO_ indication of a warning whatsoever. Honestly, if it was me in that place, I would not have a clue that I have been warned either. Just as I wouldnt do anything about it, since its VERY common for anyone to just "ask" "tell" etc to hand over the commplace.

12/23/09 22:01:33: onemanbucket@xt (all): i want a good commander
12/23/09 22:01:40: ?Finger@Alleg (all): omb, not for you to decide
12/23/09 22:01:54: ^Phoenix1@AFS (all): fine I'll just hold then
12/23/09 22:01:54: ^Phoenix1@AFS (all): w/e
12/23/09 22:01:57: onemanbucket@xt (all): night?
12/23/09 22:02:01: ^Phoenix1@AFS (all): not like a ton of other coms are stepping up
12/23/09 22:02:07: ?Finger@Alleg (all): omb hand off comm

That's twice right there theTroy. OMB knew full well what Finger was asking/telling him to do. The time from warning to boot is a talking point perhaps but not that OMB was warned. If I tell you, "Let Phoenix command" then only my charming nature is in play. If I have an @alleg tag now it's ignore me at your own peril. Im not taking a side on this just calling shennanignas on the peanut gallery's outrage given the facts presented to date.

theTroy · Post by **theTroy** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 8:08 am

Ignore me

NightRychune · Post by **NightRychune** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 8:45 am

How dare Bucket try and set up commanders who would have made for an interesting game over letting everyone bumble$#@! around in the lobby for 20 minutes? Shame on you, Bucket!

ryjamsan · Post by **ryjamsan** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 8:59 am

Seems a hard core considering less than 5 minutes or so passed. We have waited for up to 30 minutes for coms to step up before, the only difference here is that you had someone who wanted to command, P1, although I dont know who the other com was so I cant judge if that was a equal pairing of command skill. but should that matter? Unless P1 couldnt get a team and Ive never seen P1 not be able to pull in a team.

However I think FB was way to harsh perhaps a ban of 1 minute. But 3 hours plus for trying to get a decent game going? Ouch

MrChaos · Post by **MrChaos** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:17 am

FYI

theTroy's second reply was well written and absolutely fine. Personally I wish it would have been left up. Disagreeing with me is a time honored tradition in these forums

fuzzylunkin1 · Post by **fuzzylunkin1** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 10:44 am

Gotta find something to bitch about, don't we?