Move Accel GA to SUP

[Pedowich]

QUOTE (Adept @ Aug 13 2009, 06:41 PM) Either GAs should be where they are most useful (maybe even logical) in which case some need moving, or they shouldn't be where they are most useful so one needs to multitech (like was suggested also), in which case some of those useful-to-exp thing should need to be shuffled about.

QUOTE (Incredibly, still Adept @ Aug 13 2009, 06:41 PM) I think people are just used to the GAs being where they are. That is fine, we shouldn't move them unless there is a significantly better alternative. I remember once preparing a suggestion about moving GAs around. I'll dig it out and if it still seems to make sense to me, I'll post it.

Sit on fences much? If you aren't going to post an actual opinion, please do not clutter the discussion.

[Broodwich]

QUOTE (Adept @ Aug 13 2009, 03:41 PM) I'll just add this.
Yes, Accel is probably the most useful in Exp.

im really at a loss for words

anyway when imago fixes this i will start to like it

[Vortrog]

QUOTE (Correct @ Aug 12 2009, 10:05 PM) And tac needs missile damage and tracking.

There, I forum lawyer'd.

Sharp....In my experiences with Rix suptical, Rix has the best SB's in the game, why would you go exp as a second tec (heck, you would probably go FB's first anyway)? once I complete a game where Rix goes sup THEN exp I will be able to agree with you, but to date that hasnt happened.
Fact: SRM won a nonleague squad game with Suptical and it certainly consolidated my opinion of this option.
Otherwise, yes...it is usually Exp then tac.

QUOTE The only good arguments i've heard in this thread against my idea are that sup already has lots of GA's and Sup also has Heavy Boosters which are fair enough points.[/quote]

'encouraging' multi-teching is as valid an argument as 'empowering sup'. Why move Accel to Sup, when as you said yourself Rix is all about tacspansion? there is no 'sup' in 'tacspansion'

[HSharp]

Vort...are you sure your not getting mixed up with factions?

There is no reason for rix tac to get sup when you can get exp.

Rix Exp gives you range increase, damage increase, sig decrease
Rix Sup gives you.... hull ga? (ooh paper hull now becomes cardboard hull), scan ga (too eye those pesky stealthy bases?), missile damage, oh wait it doesnt because rix don't use missiles!

So yes rix has the best sbs in the game, and Exp makes them even better by increasing thier range, damage and decreasing thier sig.

[Broodwich]

WOW MULTITECHING MAKES YOUR SHIPS BETTER?????!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

[Vortrog]

QUOTE (HSharp @ Aug 14 2009, 10:01 AM) Vort...are you sure your not getting mixed up with factions?

No....but I have 2 points...one is about what should follow tac/exp as a second tech and second, if you go sup as primary tech, what would be your second tech?. My points are confusing when applied to rix because

QUOTE (HSharp @ Aug 14 2009, 10:01 AM) So yes rix has the best sbs in the game, and Exp makes them even better by increasing thier range, damage and decreasing thier sig.

, but I think they are valid for all other factions.

We are off topic.... again...I support no change for the good of encouraging multitech as an endgame strat and also to discourage turtling by economically raped teams who acquire a full suite of GA's without expanding with varying tech bases. No change will continue to reward those commanders and their teams with the skill and balls to put money into a second tech.

::tags another member for the negative accross the ropes to take up the wrestle::

edit: LOL for Brood

[Xeretov]

This isn't going anywhere. We can look at GAs again later if it starts becoming an issue.

[Correct]

There, I forum lawyer'd.

Okay let me explain because I obviously wasn't clear.

Either you move accel GA and have to look at every single other GA and propose movement for all of them or you leave them alone is what I was proposing.