TF Lead Indicators

Koln · Post by **Koln** » Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:02 pm

Great idea, let's turn the post into a photo spam post

Broodwich · Post by **Broodwich** » Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:08 pm

Makida · Post by **Makida** » Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:09 pm

juckto · Post by **juckto** » Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:02 pm

Zapper · Post by **Zapper** » Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:30 pm

I blame Florida....

DasSmiter · Post by **DasSmiter** » Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:36 pm

Post by **zombywoof** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:54 am

lexaal wrote:QUOTE (lexaal @ Jun 5 2009, 11:38 AM)

This is very appropriate considering we still have to figure out how to perk TF...

Psychosis · Post by **Psychosis** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:38 pm

What was the exact wording for the question? because when I saw it, I recall it being rather confusing as to which vote was which.

Can we please get a re-count on this with a better worded question? I think that there was some serious bias in the way it was put forward

DasSmiter · Post by **DasSmiter** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:45 pm

Q: Should TF lead indicators be set to normal? (only carriers/assault ships relay them)

Yes respondents: 243 (Of Y/N: 59.1%)
No respondents: 168 (Of Y/N: 40.9%)
Do not ask again: 124
Total Y/N: 411
Total: 535