WTF happened to GT?!?
Care to be more unspecific?
FIZ wrote:QUOTE (FIZ @ Feb 28 2011, 04:56 PM) After Slap I use Voltaire for light reading.
QUOTE [20:13] <DasSmiter> I like to think that one day he logged on and accidentally clicked his way to the EoR forumCronoDroid wrote:QUOTE (CronoDroid @ Jan 23 2009, 07:46 PM) If you're going to go GT, go Exp, unless you're Gooey. But Gooey is nuts.
[20:13] <DasSmiter> And his heart exploded in a cloud of fury[/quote]
Yield was changed. Thats it afaik
I'm sorry I don't remember any of it. For you the day spideycw graced your squad with utter destruction was the most important day of your life. But for me, it was Sunday
Idanmel wrote:QUOTE (Idanmel @ Mar 19 2012, 05:54 AM) I am ashamed for all the drama I caused, I have much to learn on how to behave when things don't go my way.
My apologies.
I think the stats are here now. Though I forget why they aren't linked on the front page and maybe something's wrong with them but I dunno. >_> Takes ages to load, too. 
GT was the least successful faction for January and February: 160 wins and 204 losses, so victory 43% of the time (Bios were the most successful, and won 53% of the time.) GT was also the least popular faction, played less often than any other (it amused me that IC was far and away the *most* popular faction, but was actually 3rd worst in terms of percentage of games won, after GT and Dregh .)
Edit: I personally never liked the GT because of their "grey concrete slab" aesthetics, the impossible-to-dock-with bases, the fact that the Palisade is almost always pushed and almost inevitably dies shortly thereafter, and all the weird tech that no-one really seems to know how to use (least of all me ). Then again they do have a certain quirky charm, and you gotta respect them for being the first player-made faction (iirc).
GT was the least successful faction for January and February: 160 wins and 204 losses, so victory 43% of the time (Bios were the most successful, and won 53% of the time.) GT was also the least popular faction, played less often than any other (it amused me that IC was far and away the *most* popular faction, but was actually 3rd worst in terms of percentage of games won, after GT and Dregh
.)Edit: I personally never liked the GT because of their "grey concrete slab" aesthetics, the impossible-to-dock-with bases, the fact that the Palisade is almost always pushed and almost inevitably dies shortly thereafter, and all the weird tech that no-one really seems to know how to use (least of all me
). Then again they do have a certain quirky charm, and you gotta respect them for being the first player-made faction (iirc).
Last edited by Makida on Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
BTW, factionstats are broken...girlyboy wrote:QUOTE (girlyboy @ Mar 28 2009, 09:19 PM) I think the stats are here now. Though I forget why they aren't linked on the front page and maybe something's wrong with them but I dunno. >_> Takes ages to load, too.
The Escapist (Justin Emerson) @ Dec 21 2010, 02:33 PM:
The history of open-source Allegiance is paved with the bodies of dead code branches, forum flame wars, and personal vendettas. But a community remains because people still love the game.
I repeat myself:FIZ wrote:QUOTE (FIZ @ Mar 28 2009, 10:31 PM) Thanks for the link GB.
pkk wrote:QUOTE (pkk @ Mar 28 2009, 10:12 PM) BTW, factionstats are broken...
The Escapist (Justin Emerson) @ Dec 21 2010, 02:33 PM:
The history of open-source Allegiance is paved with the bodies of dead code branches, forum flame wars, and personal vendettas. But a community remains because people still love the game.