Are TF Stealth Fighters weaker than the Stealth Fighters of other factions?

Development area for FreeAllegiance's Community Core.
lexaal
Posts: 2612
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:58 pm

Post by lexaal »

I think the tf Stealth Fighter is weaker than the other Stealth Fighters:
-same energy
-same # of guns
-same signature
-same guns
But:
- No Hunters/Combat drones
=> you can't kill a scout while shooting the miner
=> much harder to defend against bomber runs because you get instantly eyed when you fire
And TF doesn't start with Lt ints/Fighters at the beginning.
Advanced TF stealth figs have a third gun as a replacement for hunters

Maybe give them a bit more energy so that they could do almost as much as damage as the other sfs
Or give them another small perk.

Do you think the same ?
I have a johnson photo in my profile since 2010.
Makida
Posts: 1793
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 12:04 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Makida »

TF guns are better. And once they get all the tech, TF stealth fighters can kill bombers from beyond turret range.
Evincar
Posts: 1139
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:00 am
Location: The darkest side of the sun

Post by Evincar »

imo the srp killer should have an anti light armor counterpart, free with tac
Classifiable up to Trolleomorphism.
Valiance
Posts: 561
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 4:06 pm

Post by Valiance »

i think i small sig perk is all that is really needed as tf is supposed to be a strong end game faction (i think =])
ImageImage
CronoDroid
Posts: 4606
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:00 am
Contact:

Post by CronoDroid »

Leave TF the hell alone. They have strong endgame tech, why should their Enh tech be strong? It shouldn't.
djrbk
Posts: 2341
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 5:51 am

Post by djrbk »

Their Adv. SFs are pretty F'ing l33t.
juckto
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 7:00 am
Location: NZ

Post by juckto »

Indeed. Their sniper2's have a range of 1337m.

At original poster: You forgot the SRP killers, a truly devastating tool, and the fact that they can carry plasgens, prox (if they steal em), teleport probes, beacons, and I think probes and pulse probes.
Image
Usually though, "skill" is used to covertly mean "match the game exactly to my level of competence." Anyone who is at all worse than me should fail utterly (and humorously!) and anyone better is clearly too caught up in the game and their opinions shouldn't count.
lexaal
Posts: 2612
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:58 pm

Post by lexaal »

Yeah the advanced are fine but the normal ones are weak. I've seen only a few games with tf tac from the beginning.
And weakening the sf doesn't change the incredible hitbox of their ints.

Should their standard tech be weaker than any other faction?

Tell me how to defend with util 2 tf normal sfs vs a bbr run? They don't have a backup lt int or fig or patt.
I have a johnson photo in my profile since 2010.
Valiance
Posts: 561
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 4:06 pm

Post by Valiance »

towers.
ImageImage
Broodwich
Posts: 5662
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:48 am
Location: Raincity

Post by Broodwich »

if you dont have snipers by the time you have sfs up your commander should be mutinied and booted for not knowing what the hell hes doing. That being said tf can build two sc towers at once, and sfs can carry like 3 plas gens per rack. Having bombers is also a good idea to use as gs
QUOTE Drizzo: ha ha good old chap
Drizzo: i am a brit
Drizzo: tut tut
Drizzo: wankarrrrrr
Drizzo: i only have sex whilst in the missionary position[/quote] Fas est et ab hoste doceri - Ovid
Post Reply