Tales from the leaderboard

Allegiance discussion not belonging in another forum.
Post Reply
Parasitism
Posts: 652
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:37 pm
Location: Anonymous

Post by Parasitism »

Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Feb 4 2009, 04:05 AM) Fact the Seventh.

Station Kills: PK are ahead here with a total of 6659. Obviously the Knights prefer to kill rather than capture. Next are ACE with 6291 although how many of these are BV bombing his own bases we can’t tell.
I'd say at least 500-1250 are BV bombing his own bases!
ImageImage
Anime-Planet.com - anime | manga | reviews
TheBored
Posts: 4680
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 7:00 am
Location: At my desk staring at my monitor...

Post by TheBored »

pkk wrote:QUOTE (pkk @ Feb 4 2009, 12:20 PM) That means, they go for the drones, instand of killing nans first... ;)
Hey, whatever gets the job done :P

TB
Image
spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ Nov 28 2008, 02:50 PM) All the retards are contained in one squad mostly (System X)
[18:48] <Imago> dont take me seriously
fufi
Posts: 297
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 7:26 pm
Contact:

Post by fufi »

*hmm* ... well when you would be able to find out who I am on that board all would be different, pretty a lot of a lot=)^^
Raveen
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Birmingham, UK
Contact:

Post by Raveen »

Fact the Ninth.

Squad Leaders: The SLs rank up as follows. From top to bottom: pkk , spideycw, Shizoku, champyx, MadAccountant, finki, Raveen, javaswiller, Aeris, _SRM_Xason, kramari, Striker. Shiz, pkk and MadAccountant are the biggest stacking SLs with Aeris and Xason the top antistackers.
ImageImage
Spidey: Can't think of a reason I'd need to know anything
MadAccountant
Posts: 2610
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by MadAccountant »

Based on how the stacking ranking is calculated it would be more accurate to say that Shiz, pkk and I attract teams that win more than the others. Insinuating anything else will have to have facts behind it that unfortunately cannot be obtained. I cannot control who joins the team after I do. I also cannot be faulted for actually pulling out a win with a lower ranked team either. :P
Grimmwolf_GB
Posts: 3710
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Grimmwolf_GB »

At least one ranking where GB is first. :D
Raveen
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Birmingham, UK
Contact:

Post by Raveen »

MadAccountant wrote:QUOTE (MadAccountant @ Feb 5 2009, 01:45 PM) Based on how the stacking ranking is calculated it would be more accurate to say that Shiz, pkk and I attract teams that win more than the others. Insinuating anything else will have to have facts behind it that unfortunately cannot be obtained. I cannot control who joins the team after I do. I also cannot be faulted for actually pulling out a win with a lower ranked team either. :P
I'm not trying to provide any sort of commentary, all I'm doing is pulling data off the leaderboard. Interpretation I leave to others ;)
ImageImage
Spidey: Can't think of a reason I'd need to know anything
Sushi
Posts: 405
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 7:00 am

Post by Sushi »

MadAccountant wrote:QUOTE (MadAccountant @ Feb 5 2009, 09:45 AM) Based on how the stacking ranking is calculated it would be more accurate to say that Shiz, pkk and I attract teams that win more than the others. Insinuating anything else will have to have facts behind it that unfortunately cannot be obtained. I cannot control who joins the team after I do. I also cannot be faulted for actually pulling out a win with a lower ranked team either. :P
I don't suppose we have data to measure stack intentionality? In other words, can we (reasonably) determine what the relative team ranks were immediately before the player joined?
Raveen
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Birmingham, UK
Contact:

Post by Raveen »

Sushi wrote:QUOTE (Sushi @ Feb 5 2009, 02:52 PM) I don't suppose we have data to measure stack intentionality? In other words, can we (reasonably) determine what the relative team ranks were immediately before the player joined?
I see no reason why we can't get that data assuming TAG records:

When a player joins
When a player leaves

If you know that you can tell what the imbalance between the teams was at time of joining which is relevant. A bail statistic might be interesting (team imbalance at time of leaving).
ImageImage
Spidey: Can't think of a reason I'd need to know anything
Shizoku
Posts: 5816
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Ozzy's right nut.

Post by Shizoku »

Again the leaderboard takes into account two of my personalities, lol. If you combined both my stats would they be higher than PKK?
Image
Post Reply