I'd say at least 500-1250 are BV bombing his own bases!Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Feb 4 2009, 04:05 AM) Fact the Seventh.
Station Kills: PK are ahead here with a total of 6659. Obviously the Knights prefer to kill rather than capture. Next are ACE with 6291 although how many of these are BV bombing his own bases we can’t tell.
Tales from the leaderboard
-
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:37 pm
- Location: Anonymous
Hey, whatever gets the job donepkk wrote:QUOTE (pkk @ Feb 4 2009, 12:20 PM) That means, they go for the drones, instand of killing nans first...![]()

TB

[18:48] <Imago> dont take me seriouslyspideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ Nov 28 2008, 02:50 PM) All the retards are contained in one squad mostly (System X)
-
- Posts: 2610
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 7:00 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Based on how the stacking ranking is calculated it would be more accurate to say that Shiz, pkk and I attract teams that win more than the others. Insinuating anything else will have to have facts behind it that unfortunately cannot be obtained. I cannot control who joins the team after I do. I also cannot be faulted for actually pulling out a win with a lower ranked team either. 

-
- Posts: 3710
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 7:00 am
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
I'm not trying to provide any sort of commentary, all I'm doing is pulling data off the leaderboard. Interpretation I leave to othersMadAccountant wrote:QUOTE (MadAccountant @ Feb 5 2009, 01:45 PM) Based on how the stacking ranking is calculated it would be more accurate to say that Shiz, pkk and I attract teams that win more than the others. Insinuating anything else will have to have facts behind it that unfortunately cannot be obtained. I cannot control who joins the team after I do. I also cannot be faulted for actually pulling out a win with a lower ranked team either.![]()

I don't suppose we have data to measure stack intentionality? In other words, can we (reasonably) determine what the relative team ranks were immediately before the player joined?MadAccountant wrote:QUOTE (MadAccountant @ Feb 5 2009, 09:45 AM) Based on how the stacking ranking is calculated it would be more accurate to say that Shiz, pkk and I attract teams that win more than the others. Insinuating anything else will have to have facts behind it that unfortunately cannot be obtained. I cannot control who joins the team after I do. I also cannot be faulted for actually pulling out a win with a lower ranked team either.![]()
I see no reason why we can't get that data assuming TAG records:Sushi wrote:QUOTE (Sushi @ Feb 5 2009, 02:52 PM) I don't suppose we have data to measure stack intentionality? In other words, can we (reasonably) determine what the relative team ranks were immediately before the player joined?
When a player joins
When a player leaves
If you know that you can tell what the imbalance between the teams was at time of joining which is relevant. A bail statistic might be interesting (team imbalance at time of leaving).