Making TT Usable

Development area for FreeAllegiance's Community Core.
apochboi
Posts: 1744
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 7:00 am
Location: Dundee, Scotland

Post by apochboi »

TakingArms wrote:QUOTE (TakingArms @ Jul 1 2008, 05:56 PM) You two are in the wrong forum.
Still not sure where we should go with this
Last edited by apochboi on Tue Jul 01, 2008 11:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Stingrae
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:03 pm
Location: South Africa

Post by Stingrae »

Thinking Expansion is flawed in itself, wtf is a defensive craft doing in expansion, it should be concentrating on con D, and con enhancement.
Last edited by Stingrae on Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
02/08/09 08:32:33: goatporn@sysX (all): MTCIA
02/08/09 08:32:34: goatporn@sysX (all): LORLFL
02/08/09 08:32:41: goatporn@sysX (all): what
Adept
Posts: 8660
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Turku, Finland

Post by Adept »

Any love for the "HTT needs bomber researched" and getting rid of TT's?

It's somewhat radical, but then again TT's are so rarely used I doubt they would be missed. If it feels awful in actual games, CC can just switch things back in the next update.
ImageImageImageImageImage
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
Lykourgos
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Portland

Post by Lykourgos »

I don't love it! Having to buy bombers is annoying as $#@!.

In fact I vote we buff tac by unlinking sbs from bombers.
Adept
Posts: 8660
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Turku, Finland

Post by Adept »

Lykourgos wrote:QUOTE (Lykourgos @ Jul 2 2008, 10:44 PM) In fact I vote we buff tac by unlinking sbs from bombers.
I would work for me as well (removing TT's as well I suppose?). Symmetry is nice.
ImageImageImageImageImage
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
Correct
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 6:31 pm

Post by Correct »

Adept wrote:QUOTE (Adept @ Jul 2 2008, 12:50 PM) I would work for me as well (removing TT's as well I suppose?). Symmetry is nice.
Thirded.
TakingArms wrote:QUOTE (TakingArms @ Aug 9 2009, 07:15 AM) it's interesting how politics turns ordinarily funny, kind-hearted people into vicious, hateful attack mongers. Except IB, he's just always that way.

People just take stuff too seriously I think. Except IB, of course.
Death3D
Posts: 2288
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 5:49 pm
Location: Panama City, Panama

Post by Death3D »

And also for figbombers?
One short sleep past, we wake eternally and Death shalt be no more; Death, thou shalt die! Image
Vlymoxyd
Posts: 985
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Québec, Canada
Contact:

Post by Vlymoxyd »

Removing bombers as a pre for sbs is something I'd like to try. The only problem is that I think that allegiance doesn't need more price cuts.
"Désolé pour les skieurs, moi je veux voir mes fleurs!"
-German teacher

Image
http://www.steelfury.org/
Correct
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 6:31 pm

Post by Correct »

Vlymoxyd wrote:QUOTE (Vlymoxyd @ Jul 2 2008, 01:49 PM) Removing bombers as a pre for sbs is something I'd like to try. The only problem is that I think that allegiance doesn't need more price cuts.
Maybe we could play on med med instead of high high all the time.
TakingArms wrote:QUOTE (TakingArms @ Aug 9 2009, 07:15 AM) it's interesting how politics turns ordinarily funny, kind-hearted people into vicious, hateful attack mongers. Except IB, he's just always that way.

People just take stuff too seriously I think. Except IB, of course.
Weylin
Posts: 669
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:00 am

Post by Weylin »

Give TT's an EMP turret that fires bullets that look like troops with a sound effect of someone screaming and gasping for air after the air lock is opened
Post Reply