Fun long game.
-
Your_Persona
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 8:00 am
- Contact:
I really liked how we would camp their bases and bring a bomber in. Never done that with sup before.
I think its really nice to have some fresh air breathed into the Sup path. Dreg doesn't have the strongest int's and thats probly why it worked, but it was still so much fun.
Great game everyone. Sorry it ended in a resign for the other team. Their com was to tired to finish.
-->>Elitism<<--
I'm not Hamlet. I don't take part any more. My words have nothing to tell me anymore.
I'm not Hamlet. I don't take part any more. My words have nothing to tell me anymore.
I recognize one name on blue besides Ducky...and I know all of yellow. That may account for your ease in camping. Either that or they were tac
I'm sorry I don't remember any of it. For you the day spideycw graced your squad with utter destruction was the most important day of your life. But for me, it was Sunday
Idanmel wrote:QUOTE (Idanmel @ Mar 19 2012, 05:54 AM) I am ashamed for all the drama I caused, I have much to learn on how to behave when things don't go my way.
My apologies.
We went Exp, but yellow really had a large helo advantage (40-45%).spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ Jun 15 2008, 07:15 PM) I recognize one name on blue besides Ducky...and I know all of yellow. That may account for your ease in camping. Either that or they were tac
Does anyone remember what happened to the bomber that was destroying the last tac rock?
Don't stow thrones in grass houses.
That was a ridiculous resign. We had heavy ints, adv cons, the map, and 20K (!) in the bank. #draw, maybe. Pass it to another comm, maybe. But resign a perfectly salvagable game ... why, for the love of God, why!?
On the other hand, TF adv sup is a hard nut to crack. It wasn't clear what we could have done to win. The sup sector was probed to hell and back, so no luck with sbs or htts. SY was off so XRM was out of the question. Any cons we pushed would die quickly to galv or sbs within minutes (unless we pushed a garr con, perhaps). We didnt have the coordination for camp and bomb (if such a thing is even possible with dreg ints against tf figs).
On the other hand, TF adv sup is a hard nut to crack. It wasn't clear what we could have done to win. The sup sector was probed to hell and back, so no luck with sbs or htts. SY was off so XRM was out of the question. Any cons we pushed would die quickly to galv or sbs within minutes (unless we pushed a garr con, perhaps). We didnt have the coordination for camp and bomb (if such a thing is even possible with dreg ints against tf figs).
Globemaster_III wrote:QUOTE (Globemaster_III @ Jan 11 2018, 11:27 PM) as you know i think very little of cashto, cashto alway a flying low pilot, he alway flying a trainer airplane and he rented
TF sup sure is tough to crack. There was a game a couple of weeks back in which TF just had an adv sup in one sector, and a pali got pushed there, but we won anyhow. Your best bet is to let them have two sectors and fake on the other one. A shame really that SY was off especially on such a big game.
spideycw - 'This is because Grav is a huge whining bitch. But we all knew that already' Dec 19 2010, 07:36 PM
Dreg had two garrs, an exp and a sup. Dreg not having tele by the sup (TF had galvs) allowed me and Paps to SB that sup when most of Dreg team were on a HTT run.
I think the main reason we succeeded was that we defended against your bbr/HTT runs so effectively. You left our tele alone so we can camp all we want and rip back to D when you run on our sup. Also those low sig beacons were awesome for camping. Also YP's pushing of teles.
Our team's lag-inducing hemorrhage of probes was nice too.
I think the main reason we succeeded was that we defended against your bbr/HTT runs so effectively. You left our tele alone so we can camp all we want and rip back to D when you run on our sup. Also those low sig beacons were awesome for camping. Also YP's pushing of teles.
Our team's lag-inducing hemorrhage of probes was nice too.
