Escher

IB_ · Post by **IB_** » Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:36 pm

I thought the layout could be a little clearer.

aqhorus · Post by **aqhorus** » Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:19 pm

IB_ wrote:QUOTE (IB_ @ Apr 28 2008, 05:36 PM) I thought the layout could be a little clearer.

Escher

IB_ · Post by **IB_** » Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:32 pm

You see I have a major problem with maps designed to look like something, instead of designed for good gameplay.

Sushi · Post by **Sushi** » Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:23 pm

In this case, I think that the original design is plenty clear and readable... plus it looks cool. Keep it. /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />

madpeople · Post by **madpeople** » Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:55 pm

simple does make it much more obvious which sectors are more important than others.

though the original does look good and doesn't look too crowded (i don't remember any problems last time i played it, though i can't remember when that was)

zecro · Post by **zecro** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:08 am

Cool is better than simple because the middle top and bottom sectors are more obviously important.

IB_ · Post by **IB_** » Fri May 02, 2008 5:05 am

Original it is.

Beez · Post by **Beez** » Tue May 06, 2008 6:52 pm

original, definitly
sry i didnt post b4 (tho u probably thought that a good thing /wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" /> )
i havent been on for a while