Page 1 of 23
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:22 am
by Adept
So, some of you wanted a better analysis on the various factors involved in firearm deaths. I think this article should serve.
http://election.princeton.edu/2012/12/22/s...cans-gun-error/
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:34 pm
by raumvogel
GD it. I came her for Guns22.
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 8:01 pm
by MrChaos
My Friend the Finnish Flash way to never say never.
I
could be wrong, and call a pass on googling this one (general body of work and no passion on the subject) but everything I've read regarding the ability to carry concealed weapons means gun violence of all kinds goes down. Why? *shrug* Is it true or data cherry picking? *shrug*
I hope you understand if I just kind of meander off and pick my belly button lint now. After all for me it wasn't the subject matter rather the first graph itself that had my interest
Nerd-tastically Yours
MrChaos
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 2:22 am
by Adept
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:03 pm
by Adept
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:56 pm
by lexaal
I just got this well-balanced ;-) propaganda.
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 9:10 pm
by Adept
Didn't want to make a new thread.
It's a great show to watch

and hey, it
is on the subject.
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:04 am
by germloucks
The one thing i noticed about the gun debate is that Jon Stewart is getting preachy.
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 3:01 am
by HSharp
Just wondering about the gun nuts afraid of government tryanny, shouldn't that mean anti-tank and anti-aircraft armaments be legal? Of course if that happens then civilian aeroplanes should be able to be equipped with Air-To-Surface missiles so there is mutually assured destruction while corporate/commercial aircraft should be able to buy fighter jets for escort as armed security.
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 3:49 am
by SgtMajor
HSharp wrote:QUOTE (HSharp @ Jan 9 2013, 08:01 PM) while corporate/commercial aircraft should be able to buy fighter jets for escort as armed security.
Its not talked about, but they do
Corporate ones that is