Squad Roster cleaning
I can understand a few inactive members staying on the lists , but don't you think it is time to cleanup a bit? It would look a little nicer as opposed to having so many inactives
The Last ACS Student
http://alleg.tripod.comDoc Izzo wrote:QUOTE (Doc Izzo @ Sep 21 2012, 06:34 AM) k10, when people fear you like they fear me, you can get at me.
-
- Posts: 4263
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:00 am
- Location: Within your command center, enacting fatal attacks upon your conscripts
- Contact:
What is it with people insisting that squad rosters not have inactives on them?
RT Members do this all the time and I always rail against it because it's SILLY.
Aside from that, do you honestly think that it would look better if it looked like this?
Pruned Squads Roster
Now keep in mind that those numbers are at their highest point of the year due to the squad tournaments going on and it's typically closer to HALF OF THAT.
At around the time NI formed, it looked a lot more like this, numbers-wise:
pre-tourney
At first glance, on my screen at least, this:
looks far more "full" and to the uneducated eye gives the impression that there are a lot more people than there actually are active.
Since psychologically speaking, first impressions and first glances are EXCEEDINGLY formative and important, a page that's "fuller" is a better thing for new players to see than one that's sparse.
That's of course assuming that they even SEE it after they sign in, see no games active, and go find a different free game to play.
In short: Not only should it be up to squads, pruning or not pruning is a matter of perceived image ONLY and in my opinion incredibly silly as a discussion. The only thing I despise more than discussions on pruning rosters are people putting an "Abstain" option in polls.
RT Members do this all the time and I always rail against it because it's SILLY.
Aside from that, do you honestly think that it would look better if it looked like this?
Pruned Squads Roster
Now keep in mind that those numbers are at their highest point of the year due to the squad tournaments going on and it's typically closer to HALF OF THAT.
At around the time NI formed, it looked a lot more like this, numbers-wise:
pre-tourney
At first glance, on my screen at least, this:
looks far more "full" and to the uneducated eye gives the impression that there are a lot more people than there actually are active.
Since psychologically speaking, first impressions and first glances are EXCEEDINGLY formative and important, a page that's "fuller" is a better thing for new players to see than one that's sparse.
That's of course assuming that they even SEE it after they sign in, see no games active, and go find a different free game to play.
In short: Not only should it be up to squads, pruning or not pruning is a matter of perceived image ONLY and in my opinion incredibly silly as a discussion. The only thing I despise more than discussions on pruning rosters are people putting an "Abstain" option in polls.
-
- Posts: 3170
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:51 am
Bard wrote:QUOTE (Bard @ Mar 12 2012, 12:14 PM) What is it with people insisting that squad rosters not have inactives on them?
RT Members do this all the time and I always rail against it because it's SILLY.
Aside from that, do you honestly think that it would look better if it looked like this?
Pruned Squads Roster
Now keep in mind that those numbers are at their highest point of the year due to the squad tournaments going on and it's typically closer to HALF OF THAT.
At around the time NI formed, it looked a lot more like this, numbers-wise:
pre-tourney
At first glance, on my screen at least, this:
looks far more "full" and to the uneducated eye gives the impression that there are a lot more people than there actually are active.
Since psychologically speaking, first impressions and first glances are EXCEEDINGLY formative and important, a page that's "fuller" is a better thing for new players to see than one that's sparse.
That's of course assuming that they even SEE it after they sign in, see no games active, and go find a different free game to play.
In short: Not only should it be up to squads, pruning or not pruning is a matter of perceived image ONLY and in my opinion incredibly silly as a discussion. The only thing I despise more than discussions on pruning rosters are people putting an "Abstain" option in polls.
I don't think new people worry too much about the Squad roster list. Took me 3 years to find it, and 5 years to actually care about it. Basically you are saying that you would not clear out your garage full of useless @#(!, because potential buyers would be more compelled by a full house?
The Last ACS Student
http://alleg.tripod.comDoc Izzo wrote:QUOTE (Doc Izzo @ Sep 21 2012, 06:34 AM) k10, when people fear you like they fear me, you can get at me.
I can understand certain cases (OptimusPrime for one) but other who simply have moved on and left the community/only post on forum/don't $#@!ing log in, should be removed.blake420 wrote:QUOTE (blake420 @ Mar 12 2012, 05:20 PM) IMO squad rosters are not usally pruned very often out of respect for highly reguarded squad memebers. it would almost be in the same fasion of eraseing a MIA/KIA becuse it happened a really long time ago.
The Last ACS Student
http://alleg.tripod.comDoc Izzo wrote:QUOTE (Doc Izzo @ Sep 21 2012, 06:34 AM) k10, when people fear you like they fear me, you can get at me.
I still <3 you Heyoka but log on in so I can pod youHeyoka wrote:QUOTE (Heyoka @ Mar 13 2012, 04:03 AM) I think YOU should be removed!
The Last ACS Student
http://alleg.tripod.comDoc Izzo wrote:QUOTE (Doc Izzo @ Sep 21 2012, 06:34 AM) k10, when people fear you like they fear me, you can get at me.