Question: Why do Ints mount boost2/3?

Development area for FreeAllegiance's Community Core.
Post Reply
gr4vity
Posts: 2251
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 7:00 am
Location: irc

Post by gr4vity »

Hey!

Why are Ints allowed to mount boost2/3?

Just curious how this is justified. :cool:
ImageImage
"WyldKarde@RT: It's like the Picard Manouver, but with more hair."
Top
Weylin
Posts: 669
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:00 am

Post by Weylin »

I don't understand the question.
If they can mount boost1, why couldn't they mount 2 and 3?

Do you mean because boosters are researched in the supremacy?
Top
RealPandemonium
Posts: 649
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:32 am
Location: NY

Post by RealPandemonium »

because boost2 and 3 replace boost1. It isn't like hvy booster where you would have to switch manually after it was docked or researched.
Image IMO
Edmond wrote:QUOTE (Edmond @ Aug 31 2010, 04:20 PM) I think girly's idea is much better, since it is more freeform, only needs to be updated by one person, and maintains the openness of the command channel without the spaminess. Plus it can have ASCII goatse.
Top
gr4vity
Posts: 2251
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 7:00 am
Location: irc

Post by gr4vity »

You almost got it.
Weylin wrote:QUOTE (Weylin @ Apr 25 2010, 06:31 PM) I don't understand the question.
If they can mount boost1, why couldn't they mount 2 and 3?
I guess as a premise to your reasoning I would simply ask:

Why are they allowed to use boost1? :D
Last edited by gr4vity on Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImage
"WyldKarde@RT: It's like the Picard Manouver, but with more hair."
Top
Icky
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:00 am

Post by Icky »

There were talks about this last year and I think the year before that as well. Basically someone suggested that we make a separate tech tree for exp boosters that are not the same as supremacy boosters. All parties eventually agreed it was a lot of work without much benefit.
Terran wrote:QUOTE (Terran @ Jan 20 2011, 03:56 PM) i'm like adept
Broodwich wrote:QUOTE (Broodwich @ Jun 6 2010, 10:19 PM) if you spent as much time in game as trollin sf might not be dead
Top
Broodwich
Posts: 5662
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:48 am
Location: Raincity

Post by Broodwich »

because they do
QUOTE Drizzo: ha ha good old chap
Drizzo: i am a brit
Drizzo: tut tut
Drizzo: wankarrrrrr
Drizzo: i only have sex whilst in the missionary position[/quote] Fas est et ab hoste doceri - Ovid
Top
Drizzo
Posts: 3685
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 8:00 am

Post by Drizzo »

gr4vity wrote:QUOTE (gr4vity @ Apr 25 2010, 07:20 PM) Hey!

Why are Ints allowed to mount boost2/3?

Just curious how this is justified. :cool:
Why are you allowed to command RT's squad games?

I'm just curious how this is justified.
cashto wrote:QUOTE (cashto @ Oct 16 2010, 02:48 AM) Interceptors are fun because without one, Drizzo would be physically incapable of entering a sector.
Top
Broodwich
Posts: 5662
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:48 am
Location: Raincity

Post by Broodwich »

need carrier!
QUOTE Drizzo: ha ha good old chap
Drizzo: i am a brit
Drizzo: tut tut
Drizzo: wankarrrrrr
Drizzo: i only have sex whilst in the missionary position[/quote] Fas est et ab hoste doceri - Ovid
Top
NightRychune
Posts: 3065
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 8:00 am

Post by NightRychune »

Why are ints allowed to dock at carriers?

Just curious how this is justified.
Top
Xeretov
Posts: 1633
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:50 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Xeretov »

Why are SFs and scouts allowed to mount small shield 2/3?

Why do we let Gunships have LRM Hunter?

Why do bombers mount gat?

Why do IC Frigates load XRM HK?

Why do Corvettes get mini-AC?

I guess its time to make every ship have its own tech for each slot.
Last edited by Xeretov on Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Community Core”