Page 1 of 5
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 6:01 pm
by djrbk
?
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:44 pm
by zombywoof
I remember stacking by 100 HELO. It was PK vs World, and I was on the PK side.
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:33 pm
by Picobozo
Stack?
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:36 pm
by Broodwich
our most recent squadgame we were stacked so hard we broke the server =\
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:27 pm
by sambasti
Everyone who says 0 is lying.
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:32 pm
by cowtown
Not true Sam, I have never purposely stacked..I aways antistack and have the rank to prove it..
edit D'oh apparently I can spell either ...

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:38 pm
by Sushi
cowtown wrote:QUOTE (cowtown @ Mar 22 2009, 05:32 PM) Not true Sam, I have never purposely stacked..I aways antistack and have the
rack to prove it..
That can't possibly be what you mean.
But yes, I too assumed that there is an implied "intentionally" in the question. I've never intentionally tried to join the "obviously winning" team.
That said, it's kind of nice to be an average enough player that I am not really capable of either stacking or antistacking (even if I did try).
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:37 pm
by sambasti
When I said it couldn't have been 0, I mean that you couldn't have never upset the balance of the game. For example, I am and 8, even if I join the team that is 2 points down and one player short, I still make that team be up 6 points with even players once I join. I wouldn't consider this "stacking" but it still upsets the balance by about 10 points when you round it.
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:45 pm
by Deathrender
I end up stacking up to about 150.
Anymore than that then the losing team is down by about 10 so I leave

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:06 pm
by badpazzword
You are under the assumption I or others stack by joining the team with the higher rank sum, which of course is wrong.
(NOT HELO! Rank sum.)