Lrm 2 & 3 gives Combat Pod 2 & 3

Discussion / Announcement area for Dark Nebulae Core development.
Tontow
Posts: 197
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:19 am
Location: USA, Washington
Contact:

Post by Tontow »

AB Missile tech gives you the equivalent AB Cannon tech, so why not do the same with Lrm and Combat pod?
Dark_Sponge
Posts: 386
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 4:43 am

Post by Dark_Sponge »

tontow wrote:
QUOTE (tontow @ Mar 19 2008, 07:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
AB Missile tech gives you the equivalent AB Cannon tech, so why not do the same with Lrm and Combat pod?

I agree, bringing home incompatible tech should give you something for rix like it does for TF
Last edited by Dark_Sponge on Thu Mar 20, 2008 4:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImageImage
Camaro
Posts: 2418
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 8:00 am

Post by Camaro »

I am NOT in favor of this.

Rix Stinger 2 is = to AB3 and they are not stealable.

Likewise, TF EW AB cannons are not stealable and TF cannot steal an AB into a cannon.

Its things like these that ACTUALLY allow commanders to buy AB3 or EW AB3 which is almost never bought normally.
Image
Image
apochboi
Posts: 1744
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 7:00 am
Location: Dundee, Scotland

Post by apochboi »

Hmmm, I am not sure what I think about this, Technically combat pod 2 I feel should be a treasure, but I dont think stinger should be changed, stingers are cheese!
pkk
Posts: 5417
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Germany, Munich

Post by pkk »

Hmm... The Chinese capture a Javelin rocket and use reverse engineering to build a 120mm smoothbore tank gun?!

Sounds unreal, like the idea that capturing LRM Hunter 2 for automatic research of Combat Pod 2. tongue.gif
The Escapist (Justin Emerson) @ Dec 21 2010, 02:33 PM:
The history of open-source Allegiance is paved with the bodies of dead code branches, forum flame wars, and personal vendettas. But a community remains because people still love the game.
Tontow
Posts: 197
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:19 am
Location: USA, Washington
Contact:

Post by Tontow »

pkk wrote:
QUOTE (pkk @ Mar 20 2008, 03:00 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hmm... The Chinese capture a Javelin rocket and use reverse engineering to build a 120mm smoothbore tank gun?!


Hmm, take the advance guidance system from the rocket and the advance ballistic knowledge and put it in a barrel.......
takingarms1
Posts: 3052
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:00 am

Post by takingarms1 »

Also why should rix, one of the most uber factions, get yet another perk?
"You give my regards to St. Peter. Or, whoever has his job, but in hell!"
- - - -
Tontow
Posts: 197
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:19 am
Location: USA, Washington
Contact:

Post by Tontow »

Would it really be a perk? Combat pod tech would give LRM tech.
Camaro
Posts: 2418
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 8:00 am

Post by Camaro »

If you do this, i demand that ALL TECH, ANY THING is stealable and useable by Belters.

That means Belter Hvy BOmbers with forward EW AB cannons/Stingers + AB missles.
Image
Image
Shizoku
Posts: 5816
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Ozzy's right nut.

Post by Shizoku »

It's been discussed before. It simplifies the core, it's really not a good idea.

Plus Rix doesn't need anymore perks.
Image
Post Reply