Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:31 am
by Gandalf2
What's the point of this core? Does it have a particular aim? Do you still want people to play it? Etc.
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:33 am
by Kltplzyxm
I was just about to post to this forum... wtf happened with this? I never got to play it once and heard lots of good stuff about it.
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:32 pm
by Gandalf2
It's just hard to get people to play together on a different forum. I think there should be a community events every week were people are encouraged (not obliged) to play standard games on a different core, so that these get played.
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:04 am
by Gappy
I'm still reading this forum and taking input.
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
by Mikhail
I don't know if Gappy still goes with this Idea but the core was the result of the idea to make a community core where the community will be heared and maybe decide changes with polls or something like that.
Btw I talkeb exactly about your idea with Raveen 1 or 2 days ago.
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:53 pm
by AaronMoore
I loved the VoS core, in the couple of large games I played.
TF seemed to be a tough force to be dealt with again - nasty bombs, and all rix sr scouts was cool. /mrgreen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="mrgreen.gif" />
I believe more playtime is necessary!
/wub.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":iluv:" border="0" alt="wub.gif" />
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:53 am
by Gappy
The idea was not that the community would vote per se on issues, but rather on who the caretaker of the core is.
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:13 pm
by Mikhail
Well is this still the idea behind it Gappy? /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:58 pm
by Gandalf2
The community sucks! Can we vote for a new one? /mrgreen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="mrgreen.gif" />
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:05 pm
by takingarms1
Gappy wrote:QUOTE (Gappy @ Jan 11 2008, 10:53 PM) The idea was not that the community would vote per se on issues, but rather on who the caretaker of the core is.
That's a good idea but I'd rather the caretaker be chosen by the admins, who are smarter and wiser by far than the majority of the community.
No offense to the majority /mrgreen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="mrgreen.gif" />