Page 1 of 3
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 8:44 pm
by JimmyNighthawk
*mmmh*
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 1:40 pm
by Cadillac
*pats Jimmeh on the head*
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 11:52 pm
by Schwartz
wtf is this?
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:12 am
by rojomojo915
if you need to ask, you obviously dont know jimmy to well
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:21 am
by fuzzylunkin1
So this is what everyone means by "Jimmy's posts". I'm glad I was able to put some sense into this.
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:26 am
by TheBored
Read the post ffs. He describes Tacspansion 101. Its even on the academy its that simple.
http://www.allegacademy.org/command/tacspansion.shtml
TB
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 3:17 am
by redxdragon
Tac first? In jimmys case, yes (especially with Giga /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" />).
But theoretically I reckon the order..
Exp - For building strong early defense, Helps Econ early (yield upgrades etc) Sig Ups
Tac - After you got the sig ups, and your econs running well, then attack enemys econ, get SBs
Sup - You get the picture
Garr tech can fit anywhere around that order, this is just IMO
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 3:18 am
by rojomojo915
It can be argued either way, but theoretically, if you go tac first and you are harassing their miners, you shouldnt have to defend your bases cause they are paydaying and defending their own miners
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:28 am
by Death3D
Unless the ship you have to defend in absolutely sucks. Which is the case if you still have Hunt1 only, STILL. $#@!ing GET HUNT2.
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 1:11 am
by CronoDroid
Go the Adv Exp. It's the more honourable option.
If only honour equated to winnage...oh well, we still have our bomber duels.