Tasking Tool

Catch-all for all development not having a specific forum.
Isgrim
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 7:00 am

Post by Isgrim »

i was thinking in the line of a UI tool that the commander can use to assign different players to different tasks, such as miner hunting, base D, probing etc. This gives commanding a new dimension as you have to know your pilots strenghts and weaknesses, where to apply them and when to rotate them so they do not get bored of miner d a hour in length for example.
The tool is for the commander, but every player can see which task they have veen assigned to and who they are working with.
Terralthra
Posts: 1748
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 8:00 am
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA

Post by Terralthra »

Isgrim wrote:QUOTE (Isgrim @ Jul 21 2006, 02:03 AM) i was thinking in the line of a UI tool that the commander can use to assign different players to different tasks, such as miner hunting, base D, probing etc. This gives commanding a new dimension as you have to know your pilots strenghts and weaknesses, where to apply them and when to rotate them so they do not get bored of miner d a hour in length for example.
The tool is for the commander, but every player can see which task they have veen assigned to and who they are working with.
I'm not sure how exactly this is DN development.
Flower
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 7:00 am
Location: K-Pax

Post by Flower »

Such a tool would be great, and it would work great in tandem with the "Blackboard in the upper right corner" Idea which was discussed in this other thread. (no clue where it is right now but I am sure you will find it or already read it)
@RT: "We've never been whores, we are misunderstood RTists."
Dengaroth
Posts: 3329
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 7:00 am
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Contact:

Post by Dengaroth »

In my opinion, such a tool would be useless, because it'd still depend on individual discipline on the pilots' side to stick to their assignments.

As we all know, that sort of discipline never happens in pickup games, and squadgames have that without needing a tool.
Image
Image
RT: The number of typical responses decreases exponentially as the number of joke options increases.
Image
guitarism
Posts: 2240
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:00 am
Location: Richmond

Post by guitarism »

Not to mention, do you really have the time do that while commanding? Metting out indivdual players on a seperate interface, when you could just as easily PM them or give an individual order. They have a checklist on their screen you know...
FIZ wrote:QUOTE (FIZ @ Feb 28 2011, 04:56 PM) After Slap I use Voltaire for light reading.
CronoDroid wrote:QUOTE (CronoDroid @ Jan 23 2009, 07:46 PM) If you're going to go GT, go Exp, unless you're Gooey. But Gooey is nuts.
QUOTE [20:13] <DasSmiter> I like to think that one day he logged on and accidentally clicked his way to the EoR forum
[20:13] <DasSmiter> And his heart exploded in a cloud of fury[/quote]
Isgrim
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 7:00 am

Post by Isgrim »

guitarism wrote:QUOTE (guitarism @ Jul 21 2006, 05:33 AM) Not to mention, do you really have the time do that while commanding? Metting out indivdual players on a seperate interface, when you could just as easily PM them or give an individual order. They have a checklist on their screen you know...
yeah, PM every player instead of a fast one click /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />

im not sure what you mean about checklists, if you refer to the wing assignments they are not chosen by the commander. The commander should disposition his forces like in a real outfit.

i am aware that the thread is probably misplaced so i started one in misc dev. too.

and that pickup games are disorganised. That is exactly what this tool is supposed to better. Not completely cure, but improve. There are dicipline in pickup games, not as good as in squadgames ofcourse. But this tool will atleast improve this aspect somewhat.
Pook
Posts: 1758
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 7:00 am
Location: Texas, USA

Post by Pook »

I love the new forums and their handy merge tool.

/mrgreen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="mrgreen.gif" />

Anyway what you really want is the ability for the command to click on any unit, click "FORCE TO..." and then click somewhere else on the map... and have the computer override the pilot and fly them to that waypoint.

/wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" />
Image
TheBored
Posts: 4680
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 7:00 am
Location: At my desk staring at my monitor...

Post by TheBored »

Though that would be nice, you would have people forcing people 20k away from base just to mess with them.

TB
Image
spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ Nov 28 2008, 02:50 PM) All the retards are contained in one squad mostly (System X)
[18:48] <Imago> dont take me seriously
Adaven
Posts: 1959
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Greater Ozarks

Post by Adaven »

_SRM_TheBored wrote:QUOTE (_SRM_TheBored @ Jul 20 2006, 05:08 PM) Though that would be nice, you would have people forcing people 20k away from base just to mess with them.

TB
Just enable every ship to eject, then this feature wouldn't be any different than forcing a gunner on your ship and launching w/o turret mounted.
Flower
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 7:00 am
Location: K-Pax

Post by Flower »

Dengaroth wrote:QUOTE (Dengaroth @ Jul 20 2006, 08:09 PM) In my opinion, such a tool would be useless, because it'd still depend on individual discipline on the pilots' side to stick to their assignments.

As we all know, that sort of discipline never happens in pickup games, and squadgames have that without needing a tool.
I think that many of the novices have indeed the "discipline' but they are lacking in skill or situational analytics.
And even if they have acquired the skills to fly the ship and the basics of the game they are still lacking the knowledge to correctly compare their current task with 'the new order'(assuming non-personal orders) and prioritize accordingly. Examples would be: Continue miner defence or defend base? Nan Bomber or keep camping Aleph and so on.

A Tasking tool would be nothing new but would rather improve upon the already present in-game system of ordering people around.
For example a tasking tool might allow to revoke assignements just by clicking on the pilot on the 'tasking tool blackboard' and putting him per drag and drop in a new group... lets say 'defend'.
Thus new appropriate orders would be automatically given to the pilot.
a) he would know that he should do miner defence until he receives such a new order.
(I guess the 'lacking discipline' stems from just not knowing if they are still supposed to do the job)
B) he would instantly receive a new order like: 'Defend Station in L'Sau' or 'prepare to be nanite escort for bomber in dunatis'


I think the possibilities of such a tool would me multitude. It just would have to been implemented and thats the hard part.

As to Squadgames:
I assume they have the 'discipline' as squadded pilots have far greater skills at situational analysis compared to pilots in pickups (along with whole-team usage of Teamspeak). As long as every member knows what to do by himself a tasking tool would be neigh useless. And for the instances where input needs to be given Teamspeak or the limited inbuilt command system is by far enough. :-)


This was the other thread which was quite similar:
http://www.freeallegiance.org/forums/index...c=22453&hl=

P.S.:
I am just saying that I see the advantages of such a system. I do not think its a priority to implement.
I would rather prefer that I would find my teammates on teamspeak while flying in pickup games.
@RT: "We've never been whores, we are misunderstood RTists."
Post Reply