Page 1 of 1

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 12:58 am
by jgbaxter
Is it things like the StarWars core before Weed had a subforum?

Things like faction ideas like Omnicron Hive?

/smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 1:49 am
by Pook
Non-Core-Specific discussion was my itention.

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:04 am
by jgbaxter
Ah, so things like the GT base door fix, cross-core stuff.

Excellent. /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:47 am
by Raveen
IB's Maps thread would be a good thing to go in here as well.

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 4:38 pm
by jgbaxter
Information on servers maybe?

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 6:37 pm
by Pook
The "base" forum should be focused on Core Development, while remaining non-core specific.

For example "Mass". Some cores reduce mass, some don't, those that do implement it differently.

So if you wanted to start the discussion over the concepts of mass and what affects it has, etc... you could start it here.

In the past I'd notice the same person start the same thread 3 times (one for each core forum) and the discussion would have 3 branches... it just makes more sense to have a place where someone can post general development concepts / ideas / questions without having to pick a core.

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 7:21 pm
by Tigereye
Pook wrote:QUOTE (Pook @ Jul 7 2006, 02:37 PM) The "base" forum should be focused on Core Development, while remaining non-core specific.

For example "Mass". Some cores reduce mass, some don't, those that do implement it differently.

So if you wanted to start the discussion over the concepts of mass and what affects it has, etc... you could start it here.

In the past I'd notice the same person start the same thread 3 times (one for each core forum) and the discussion would have 3 branches... it just makes more sense to have a place where someone can post general development concepts / ideas / questions without having to pick a core.
/blink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":o" border="0" alt="blink.gif" />

Are you saying BIOS is fat!?
ARE YOU CALLING BIOS FAT!!!??? !
/mad.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":mad:" border="0" alt="mad.gif" />

--TE

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 8:21 pm
by strike700
Tiger are you high?

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 11:36 pm
by Adaven
Tigereye wrote:QUOTE (Tigereye @ Jul 7 2006, 02:21 PM) /blink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":o" border="0" alt="blink.gif" />

Are you saying BIOS is fat!?
ARE YOU CALLING BIOS FAT!!!??? !
/mad.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":mad:" border="0" alt="mad.gif" />

--TE
Bios isn't fat, but they are dense.

Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 6:46 am
by Psychosis
how can you say that, look at your sig, you can see RIGHT THROUGH THAT!

bios is chunky, needs to lose some weight