XT vs SF

Dorjan · Post by **Dorjan** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:20 am

This is funny, Jimen must've been reading all the backlog of "how to act when you're in XT" (they have guides to tell you how I'm sure) and is now throwing down classics.

------------

Fact: we were curb-stombed
Fact: we played @#(!, that could be down to the fact XT scared all the pilots into acting like rookies or because XT made us look that bad in comparison but I know we can play batter, this is not cheapening their win. I was mearly saying "We will give you a better game next time" but w/e
Fact: XT still beat us!
Fact: BPs post $#@!ing rocked.
Fact: We've beaten XT more than SysX or PK or RT so $#@!ing suck it XT, you're worse than them and you're sore about it.
FACT: This threat was full of win!

Have a nice day ya'll!

SP4WN · Post by **SP4WN** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:35 am

You gotta love how XT comes in with all the name calling within the first post calling us bitch's, pussies, suck, w/e.

I seem to remember a lot more whining when they lost to us like chumps, seems you guys only have big mouths when you win, like lil 10 year old $#@!bags.

Cadillac · Post by **Cadillac** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:44 am

Orion wrote:QUOTE (Orion @ Feb 22 2010, 04:08 AM) Apparently 4th place is a pretty contested seat.

Post by **Raveen** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:48 am

I think the real question is: Did XT own face (whatever that means)?

SP4WN · Post by **SP4WN** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:52 am

Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Feb 22 2010, 11:48 AM) I think the real question is: Did XT own face (whatever that means)?

I wasn't there but from the sounds of it they did.

The argument appears ot hvae started because XT felt the need to come in everywhere telling everyone how much @SF sucks because they won, you know like we did when we won them.

I'm not sure about the rest of SF, but I love this XT. It makes it real fun to see them eat their own @#(! and go crying to mummy in their basement when they do lose to us, @#(! after all the losses and suck we took, we all didnt go running away and crying "quitting allegiance" because we lost.

Jimen

the retard

Cadillac · Post by **Cadillac** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:00 pm

Kumquat wrote:QUOTE (Kumquat @ Feb 22 2010, 09:04 AM) I see. So losing in 27 minutes, not having an economy, and never getting a tech base up is not being face rolled? I guess it depends on what your standards are. I know if XT put up a performance like that we would be beyond humbled. I guess though if you are a desperate loser scoring with a 400 pound blimp with acne scars and halitosis can seem ok. We are used to banging the hot chick and we don't accept anything less.

Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Feb 22 2010, 11:48 AM) I think the real question is: Did XT own face (whatever that means)?

Unfortunately not!

The standards that the Official Allegiance Game Review Committee (GCI) use to determine what constitutes "pwnage" have been significantly raised after a certain 9 minute game.

Sorry, you'll have to do better next time!

Dorjan · Post by **Dorjan** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:02 pm

SP4WN wrote:QUOTE (SP4WN @ Feb 22 2010, 11:52 AM) I love this XT. It makes it real fun to see them eat their own @#(! and go crying to mummy in their basement when they do lose to us, @#(! after all the losses and suck we took, we all didnt go running away and crying "quitting allegiance" because we lost.

Zing!

omegahero · Post by **omegahero** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:05 pm

prepare for the SF salvo nao!

Drizzo · Post by **Drizzo** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:09 pm

Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Feb 22 2010, 05:43 AM) Duckie, Clay, Ada, Gui. I'd put you around 5th mate (too many carebears in XT )

Gui will probably tell you himself that he's meaner than I. As per Clay and Ada, at this point they've raged more often than I have (although my spots have been more iconic I will admit

)

SP4WN wrote:QUOTE (SP4WN @ Feb 22 2010, 06:35 AM) You gotta love how XT comes in with all the name calling within the first post calling us bitch's, pussies, suck, w/e.

I seem to remember a lot more whining when they lost to us like chumps, seems you guys only have big mouths when you win, like lil 10 year old $#@!bags.

lol? I'm looking for all of the cursing on the entire first page (giving you the benefit of the doubt because there isn't anything in the first post) and I see... nothing?

Is it an SF thing to pull @#(! out of thin air?

SP4WN wrote:QUOTE (SP4WN @ Feb 22 2010, 06:52 AM) I wasn't there but from the sounds of it they did.

The argument appears ot hvae started because XT felt the need to come in everywhere telling everyone how much @SF sucks because they won, you know like we did when we won them.

What argument?

SF - "Yeah we really lost because we screwed up, you guys actually suck though"
XT - "lol? faceroll"

You guys really do have an excuse for everything don't you?

SP4WN wrote:QUOTE (SP4WN @ Feb 22 2010, 06:52 AM) I'm not sure about the rest of SF, but I love this XT. It makes it real fun to see them eat their own @#(! and go crying to mummy in their basement when they do lose to us, @#(! after all the losses and suck we took, we all didnt go running away and crying "quitting allegiance" because we lost.

Jimen the retard

LOL
How long was it that Striker boycotted XT because he didn't want his precious child squad to go running away and quit?

Let's see, SF beat us twice (I suppose that's what Dorj means when he said they beat us more then PK or SysX), and in both losses I see no where near the amount of excuse throwing that SF is currently doing. Failtroll much?

So you lose more often than you win... Every loss you didn't play your "best"... You beat PK and the $#@!ing terrible 2009 XT(Both of which you had to work your ass off to win, compared to the relative ease that we had walking over you), which I'm sure you will attest to those being your best games... Honestly?

I would say in my experience there's no such thing as luck... but your squad is a sheer testament to a group of people that get "lucky". That's what your record indicates.

Just an addendum -

The XT Roster is largely unchanged from October. See, instead of saying "WATCH OUR FOR US LATER IN THE YEAR GUYZ LOL", we said nothing. Nobody quit, gained 4 players, and we turned our slump around. I wish I could say the same about SF.

HSharp · Post by **HSharp** » Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:15 pm

This totally doesn't look like a curb-stomp, (or kerb-stomp for the more civilised amongst us). This looks like XT doing a solid victory but not a domination. From the report it's like SF forgot that miners need nans to survive and XT were lucky to find gat2 and df2 early.

A curb-stomp would be a horde of unturreted Dreg Bombers ending the game, or a being 7 people down and killing an opcon with 2 patties vs dreg lt ints (both vs SF

) or making a comm ragequit midway through the game, or flying a V of MF's to crush the enemy (like we did with SF instead of against them)

You may call this a curb-stomp but compared to what SysX do with SF this was more like a kick to the crotch to them, had SysX been running this show there would be no lost carrier, SF wouldn't have beaten us in kills (nothing more important than kills didn't ya know?!), there would still be a lost telecon as no SysX game is complete without spidey sacrificing a telecon to the Allegiance Gods, and it wouldn't have taken 27 minutes, it would have ended much earlier with swift death or a bit longer with some fancy game ending technique like flying a V of bombers backwards to their last base or claiming all rocks in SF's home with SY's or blocking SF's green doors and nanning them out of base so they have no ammo or fuel and are forced to drift around unable to even be podded pathetically attempting to ram us at 80mps or flying slowly to the sector edge to try and die by being out of bounds but even then being thwarted by SysX who will nan them and nudge them back into the middle like a herd of sheep being corralled by cowboys riding Grizzly Bears with elephant tasers.

...

So yeah XT beat SF, big whoop. SF once again using the excuse of being crap for being crap.