XC03

Death3D · Post by **Death3D** » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:08 am

TTs are not balanced at all. I don't mean in an 'across faction' kinda thing but 'across techpath'.

You've said 'sure they are, you can get them yourself too', but enh tech level equivalents for sup and tac destroy the base rather than add it to your repertoire.

I'd be best to scrape TTs and make Bombers a prequel to HTTs, we can adscribe it 'storywise' to developing big-missile-launch technology.

Also, IMO Exp should be as screwed as Sup and Tac are if you bomb their garrison early on.

Edit: Also, since HTT's would basically have the same innitial (entering sector) dynamics as bombing, the fact that it's friggin hvy ints escorting and also that you get to keep the base should more than make up for the fact that they have no 'gimmick' (cloak or teleporting in).

spideycw · Post by **spideycw** » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:26 am

CronoDroid wrote:QUOTE (CronoDroid @ Mar 19 2011, 06:32 AM) Giga really hasn't been viable (contrary to Spidey's belief) since when I joined

still a noob are you my patty padawan

http://www.freeallegiance.org/forums/index...showtopic=61507

CronoDroid · Post by **CronoDroid** » Sun Mar 20, 2011 4:12 am

spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ Mar 19 2011, 07:26 PM) still a noob are you my patty padawan

http://www.freeallegiance.org/forums/index...showtopic=61507

You've stated otherwise on numerous occasions! And yes, I saw that thread but I chalked it up to temporary sanity. You'll be back to your Giga Perk Hatin' Ways soon enough. Actually since we're not playing CC anymore apparently, Giga can now assume its rightful place as the economic powerhouse! They'll be the porn industry of space.

Shizoku · Post by **Shizoku** » Sun Mar 20, 2011 4:34 am

Shouldn't it be pattywan?

Broodwich · Post by **Broodwich** » Sun Mar 20, 2011 5:28 am

Shizoku wrote:QUOTE (Shizoku @ Mar 19 2011, 09:34 PM) Shouldn't it be pattywan?

Raven_42 · Post by **Raven_42** » Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:33 am

I think you've hit the nail on the head Death3D.

CronoDroid · Post by **CronoDroid** » Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:02 am

Well like I said, they may be worth taking a look at.

Post by **pkk** » Mon Mar 21, 2011 9:07 am

Death3D wrote:QUOTE (Death3D @ Mar 20 2011, 03:08 AM) I'd be best to scrape TTs and make Bombers a prequel to HTTs, we can adscribe it 'storywise' to developing big-missile-launch technology.

Also, IMO Exp should be as screwed as Sup and Tac are if you bomb their garrison early on.

I'm also suggested this, but people want TT to "be useful".

Heyoka · Post by **Heyoka** » Mon Mar 21, 2011 11:27 am

Make the TTs like Phoenix BBRs.

Un-nanable, hefty hull etc.

That way instead of having a nan train, there can just be an epic enh-tech level furball that ensues any time a TT enters a sector!

That way when the other side loses a base, it's not because TT is unbalanced...it's because they suck.

Icky · Post by **Icky** » Mon Mar 21, 2011 11:56 am

Phoenix bbrs actually had crazy SHIELDS, not hulls. And that would complicate TTs for sure since stealth is a factor.