Anyone moved out of US?

qqmwoarplox · Post by **qqmwoarplox** » Sat May 26, 2018 2:28 pm

phoenix1 wrote:QUOTE (phoenix1 @ May 25 2018, 09:46 PM) About half of the time there's a yottaton ball of iron between you and the sun. You might have missed it, it's ok, try looking down.

how about a non sarcastic arrogant answer you twat

@terran that's what I was thinking regarding solar energy but I guess there's a problem with making a large enough energy storage(?)

ryujin · Post by **ryujin** » Sat May 26, 2018 3:33 pm

Apparently P1 hasn't heard of "batteries". You know those things that can store excess energy and release it when there is more demand then supply?

I think egypt might have made some a few millenia ago

Grimmwolf_GB · Post by **Grimmwolf_GB** » Mon May 28, 2018 5:16 pm

phoenix1 wrote:QUOTE (phoenix1 @ May 25 2018, 05:58 AM) Refine the waste into more fuel. Many of the remaining compounds, if purified, could also be used in many engineering purposes... some of which are medical. From there you can take the comparatively small amount of waste produced (compared to the waste you THINK it produces) and subduct it. Or launch it into space via railgun aimed at the sun. Hell, you'll have the energy and in sufficient quantities if you go nuclear.

https://www.webmd.com/vitamins/ai/ingre ... 064/cesium

You see radioactive waste. *I* see a useful byproduct that, with a little imagination, can help our world keep running.

You are only talking about the stuff from the nuclear fuel itself. Have you seen the amount of radioactive waste leftover after the dismantling of a power plant?
Also, your useful by-product doesn't get to be new fuel without creating alot of additional radioactive waste, when you enrich/separate it to useful levels. (Comparable to the "wonderful" recycling of waste plastic.)

Regarding the long-term storage of radioactive stuff: You can't be sure that people understand language after 1000 years. There just needs to be a short period (nuclear time line) of disruption and it will be difficult to read any language. There is a active research going on regarding this issue and nothing really final has been found. This sounds trivial, but it really isn't.

Also, Geological processes are slow, but so is the decay of nuclear material. So many final storage sites where deemed to be "stable" only to drown in water shortly afterwards, sometimes because the surrounding material itself was heated up by the generated heat. This is also really not a trivial task.

Mastametz · Post by **Mastametz** » Mon May 28, 2018 6:33 pm

Basically liberal Americans are led to believe that recycling is a magical perfect process and so is the process of making batteries and using them to power everything, especially cars, and if you participate in these two things - recycling and electric cars - you have matched Europe in their supposed perfect sustainable living and are personally responsible for saving the planet and all life on it

ryujin · Post by **ryujin** » Mon May 28, 2018 8:28 pm

Sheriff Metz wrote:QUOTE (Sheriff Metz @ May 28 2018, 01:33 PM) Basically liberal Americans are led to believe that recycling is a magical perfect process and so is the process of making batteries and using them to power everything, especially cars, and if you participate in these two things - recycling and electric cars - you have matched Europe in their supposed perfect sustainable living and are personally responsible for saving the planet and all life on it

usually when you try to make a point, you make a premise (which you did), and then try to make a point (which you did not)

You're premise is utter bull@#(! too. 1 and 2 are easy and actually economically viable. 3-7 is usually money lost. This liberal knows that. I'm know many others who do too.

Try harder next time, I'm about to start listening to Globey and Elzam next time.

You remind of the few @#$%@# "conservatives" I've met, who litter and shun recycling, "to make liberals cry".
Proves nothing except they are @#$%@#s.

But this community already knows that.

but out of masochistic curiosity, did you actually have a point?

SumVeritas · Post by **SumVeritas** » Mon May 28, 2018 9:03 pm

Ryujin wrote:QUOTE (Ryujin @ May 28 2018, 03:28 PM) but out of masochistic curiosity, did you actually have a point?

A lead indicator, maybe

Mastametz · Post by **Mastametz** » Mon May 28, 2018 9:41 pm

What's most economically viable is poor liberals no longer reproducing. Everyone not reproducing really, but especially poor liberals since they both 1) have the most children and 2) are least capable of supporting/raising said children

SumVeritas · Post by **SumVeritas** » Mon May 28, 2018 10:04 pm

poor liberals are too poor to have lead indicators

ryujin · Post by **ryujin** » Mon May 28, 2018 10:13 pm

Real-estate agents usually seem like they are talking out their ass to me. I bet you are doing well.

Mastametz · Post by **Mastametz** » Mon May 28, 2018 10:32 pm

I'm not pro-choice. I'm pro-abortion. Please god kill it before it is born so I don't have to deal with it.