Page 8 of 10

Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:47 pm
by Sonic
I like how Radar has nothing else to say for himself apart from the initial :boohoo: post he made.

Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:48 pm
by HSharp
phoenix1 wrote:QUOTE (phoenix1 @ Sep 23 2009, 06:31 PM) 09/22/09 13:42:05 +spideycw@Zone (all): yellow you are about to lose your commander

So was he about to drop a commander in the middle of commanding or not?
When did spidey say he wasn't?

imo banning a commander for 0 mins after a game has ended would have been spiteful but due to enforcer delay DD wasn't dropped till after the game, so yeah not sure what southpaw means about spidey affecting that game.

Whether or not the ban was justified (and thus should or shouldn't be justified in future situations) is still up for argument. I don't think spidey ruined that game, he might have had the potential to do that if DD didn't resign but on the other hand there are lots of people waiting to play.

I find it hard to believe DD could be nanning for ~7 mins constantly and he might have been able to get some more people on miner D if he accepted players trying to join, it does annoy me very much when I see new players trying to join and then leave because they do not have the MW mindset of Allegiance is a game to be played in the lobby.

also @pkk, I'm sure TE wanted ZL's to have Enforcer Powers or otherwise he wouldn't give it to them.

Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:57 pm
by zombywoof
I guess I just don't understand the hooplah, was trying to understand the hooplah, then got caught up in the feces slinging.

Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 6:16 pm
by Koczis
spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ Sep 24 2009, 01:40 AM) You PK should be ashamed of your posts on your internal forum about this issue. All of you crying about how I booted DD and ruined the game he was commanding.

Did any of you stop to even read the full logs and notice he stayed in the game the whole time?
I'm PK and I really dislike how you imply that I should be ashamed of anything or that I can't read logs.

And if you try to stir up some hate between squads before tourney you're the one who should be ashamed.

Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 6:34 pm
by pkk
HSharp wrote:QUOTE (HSharp @ Sep 23 2009, 07:48 PM) also @pkk, I'm sure TE wanted ZL's to have Enforcer Powers or otherwise he wouldn't give it to them.
It's pretty easy.

Every ZL represents his zone, what does CC/documentation/development have to do with enforcement? Some people just don't have the sure instinct to enforcing RoC (sorry spidey).

ZL just now use the tools of the Senators, that's why they have the enforcer.

Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 6:53 pm
by takingarms1
So let me get this straight double-D (a most excellent abbreviation btw), you came to the forums and typed a half dozen paragraphs of bull@#(! due to a 0 minute ban AFTER the game ended?

Dude you need to get laid.

Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 7:20 pm
by Buyo
Has anyone even read the whole post? I read up to the first paragraph and then saw the wave of text and gave up.

Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 7:22 pm
by spideycw
phoenix1 wrote:QUOTE (phoenix1 @ Sep 23 2009, 12:13 PM) Yeah, wtf, I totally didn't jump to conclusions and asked for clarification! I'm soooo terrible :roll:

In addition, did anyone BOTHER to post the whole logs? That's why I haven't made any claims as to what happened, but of course Nuke feels differently.


I don't see that in Dome's logs at all.
Didn't you jump to a conclusion when you said something similar to "Oh Ok so who is the new CC ZL now?" or am I mistaken?

The whole logs were posted prior to your post AND in your squad forum.

Dome's logs are somewhere up above - I'm sure you can find them
Paradigm2 wrote:QUOTE (Paradigm2 @ Sep 23 2009, 12:19 PM) Shame on SysX for making assumptions about what discussions occur on internal forums.

Oh wait, we're all individuals with our own opinions? Then just shame on Spidey.
Sorry I am not making assumptions. I am speaking off what one of your members told me about said internal discussion - and calling out two people off their rocker. Notice I didn't say anything about you Para :lol:
Koczis wrote:QUOTE (Koczis @ Sep 23 2009, 01:16 PM) I'm PK and I really dislike how you imply that I should be ashamed of anything or that I can't read logs.

And if you try to stir up some hate between squads before tourney you're the one who should be ashamed.
Sorry I was using PK in the royal "we manner" I don't mean to lump you in together. I guess I should the PK who have lied about how I ruined their game by booting DareDevil in the midst of his commanding. So THEY should be ashamed and they obviously can't or wont read logs.

However I notice you came in this thread just to post that. Not to comment on the fact your squad mate made a newbie leave. Not that your squad mate had time to rant on all chat but not to accept anyone.

Did you come in this thread to address the fact that some new guy was trying to play for 5 minutes then gave up and left?
Did you come in this thread to call your buddy out for his outright lies?
QUOTE bans com from game (while he's actively naning another miner hanging by a thread)[/quote]
QUOTE I seen finger wait till game is over b4 even doing autobans on commanders.[/quote]
QUOTE IF you boot a commander whilst the game is UNDERWAY the command falls to the next person on the list.[/quote]

That is three quotes right there from your own $#@!ing squad members blatantly lying. BLATANTLY.

Do you post one word about that or just come here to whine?
Do you address these issues?
No of course not - you just complain how evil it is of my to lump you in with other people in the squad whose tag you proudly wear

Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 7:30 pm
by Paradigm2
QUOTE However I notice you came in this thread just to post that. Not to comment on the fact your squad mate made a newbie leave. Not that your squad mate had time to rant on all chat but not to accept anyone.[/quote]

Nice baiting, but we (those in PK) who are offended by your blanket statements certainly have the right to come to this thread and address those statements in isolation.

And I accept your apology.

Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 7:33 pm
by spideycw
Paradigm2 wrote:QUOTE (Paradigm2 @ Sep 23 2009, 03:30 PM) Nice baiting, but we (those in PK) who are offended by your blanket statements certainly have the right to come to this thread and address those statements in isolation.

And I accept your apology.
Welp using PK seemed easier than typing out all those hopping on board the "hate while ignoring the evidence" train but in the future I will specifically list all individuals to avoid lumping you all in together - even though everyone who is complaining that I banned him during the game seems to be from PK (granted I may have missed someone else - but all I saw were DD, Southpaw, P1, Sycrus, and Orion)