NightRychune wrote:QUOTE (NightRychune @ Jan 27 2011, 06:08 PM) there's only one thing in allegiance that's truly UNSTOPPABLE, and it isn't ints
Carriers? j/k
Guys... with regards to "so is cc becoming blah blah"... note this is just a discussion. No further PP nerf is scheduled for cc12 as of now, AFAIK. There are FAR more important balance issues...we are getting too focused on this.
Want bigger games? Log on to play at the official game time: 9pmET/8pmCT/7pmMT/6pmPT every day of the week. Also Saturdays 8pm UTC.
TurkeyXIII wrote:QUOTE (TurkeyXIII @ Jan 26 2011, 10:12 PM) The problem the way I see it isn't int vs sf, it's pp vs anything else. You want to find a way to remove its deprobing and miner-finding abilities without affecting the int/stealth relationship.
SpkWill wrote:QUOTE (SpkWill @ Jan 27 2011, 10:30 AM) The problem I always had with pps is it's a 5k basic tech which is very effective at stopping every endgame, htts, tp2s, sbs are all massively easier to stop if you have pps to spot them with. Buying adv scouts by comparison is a lot more expensive and the range is nowhere near that of a default pp anyway. Also ships only have decent scan to the front so even giga lxy scouts and bios adv with ship sensor2 are inferior to pps.
It's never been so much a matter of techpath balance as making it harder to turtle. Turtles are $#@!ing boring games and imo should be discouraged.
These sum up my views on PPs. There's no particular problem with the current int vs SF balance, other than there being too many idiots who don't know how to fly SFs. However, pulse probes are a scout's worst enemy, and there's absolutely no balance on that front.
As many people have said countless times, stopping tac starts at the aleph not with PP. The reason for a nerf in PP is the fact it takes away a lot of the stealth aspect of HTTs, SB, Ninja Bombing, where you have to be silly far away from a scout (and not just behind the scout as the probe is 360 degrees 5k range where as a scout is only 100% effective at the front)
Everyone knows I'm all for the quicker game.
I decided to relive the days gone by in my new blog.
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?
Dorjan wrote:QUOTE (Dorjan @ Jan 31 2011, 12:33 PM) Everyone knows I'm all for the quicker game.
Your wife and Baha knows it better than enyone.
Duckwarrior wrote:QUOTE (Duckwarrior @ Mar 8 2017, 09:38 PM) Desert eagle .50 cal from beechcraft bonanza as fly poor people over doctor son beechcraft bonanza trump beef texas ping pong boat 400k doctor son beefsteak good texas cali donald trump hilary dumocrats
SumVeritas wrote:QUOTE (SumVeritas @ Jan 31 2011, 05:54 PM) Your wife and Baha knows it better than enyone.
rawr!
I decided to relive the days gone by in my new blog.
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?