Heavy Booster

Development area for FreeAllegiance's Community Core.
Post Reply
Psychosis
Posts: 4218
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 7:00 am
Location: California

Post by Psychosis »

P1 its a moot point anyway, thats too much prereqs for a tech, it won't get used enough to warrant its existance
zombywoof
Posts: 6523
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:59 am
Location: Over the Rainbow

Post by zombywoof »

No, I'm commenting on how stupid Icky's insistance that an exp team who also splashes sup is clearly uberly wealthy and CLEARLY has already won, despite the fact that a) all exp teams multitech (pretty much), and b) 10k isn't a super large sum of money.
Image
Don't find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain.
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Apr 1 2009, 09:35 PM) But I don't read the forums I only post.
Icky
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:00 am

Post by Icky »

P1, I know you are a master and all, but please clarify for me how "If you let them double tech, tough" means that I am implying the game is over.

The original context was regarding an exp team buying a sup and stealing boost3. My point stands: if you buy them boost3, and they buy a sup, well then tough @#(! and don't cry about it when you fight boost3 hvy ints. The boost isn't the problem in that scenario.

But thanks for yet again derailing an otherwise productive thread in order to nitpick perceived issues in someone else's argument over details that are in no $#@!ing way relevant to the topic at hand in order to grow your own epeen! You are remarkable in your consistency!
Terran wrote:QUOTE (Terran @ Jan 20 2011, 03:56 PM) i'm like adept
Broodwich wrote:QUOTE (Broodwich @ Jun 6 2010, 10:19 PM) if you spent as much time in game as trollin sf might not be dead
Weylin
Posts: 669
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:00 am

Post by Weylin »

It's really not even needed, and encourages what you shouldn't even be doing in fighters; dog fighting ints instead of killing their cons miners and bases.

If not removal, it should have less burn time. What is it now? 10 seconds? 4-5 seconds would probably be better.

I don't understand why fighters should be given equipment to make themselves better in nearly every aspect as a heavy int. Interceptors are supposed to be the ONE thing that fighters suck against.
They're supposed to be flexible long range group objective ships, not boost around and whore everything in sight ships.
gr4vity
Posts: 2251
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 7:00 am
Location: irc

Post by gr4vity »

Yup HvyBooster is not the issue here. The fig size reduction that was introduced a while back weights much heavier as it effects Sup in every phase. By the time you can afford HvyBooster you actually deserve to buy some tech to compete with Exp.

Of course it also makes a nice tool for miner offense - mainly because it allows you to react quickly if you spot an undefended miner.. But again it only adds to the effect of the reduced size which makes it so hard to hit some these AdvFig models.
ImageImage
"WyldKarde@RT: It's like the Picard Manouver, but with more hair."
Broodwich
Posts: 5662
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:48 am
Location: Raincity

Post by Broodwich »

oopos wrong thread
Last edited by Broodwich on Sat Nov 21, 2009 7:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
QUOTE Drizzo: ha ha good old chap
Drizzo: i am a brit
Drizzo: tut tut
Drizzo: wankarrrrrr
Drizzo: i only have sex whilst in the missionary position[/quote] Fas est et ab hoste doceri - Ovid
Shizoku
Posts: 5816
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Ozzy's right nut.

Post by Shizoku »

I disagree Grav, if hvy boost was removed Exp would win a lot more. I've always said that the int's main advantage is to out accelerate any other ship, with hvy boost it looses that advantage. When the sup team gets hvy boost, you can no longer htt either stealth or forcecap, you can no longer push conns or shove bombers down their throat, you can't really do any form of end game tech because the accell advantage allows the figs to escape the ints and destroy their target without even engaging the ints.

Why it's taken this long for pug teams to realize how powerful this tech is is beyond me. Whatever, I actually agree with the majority for once and I think it should be removed, it's probably the most unbalanced piece of tech in the entire core.
Last edited by Shizoku on Sat Nov 21, 2009 9:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
madpeople
Posts: 4787
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 8:00 am
Location: England

Post by madpeople »

It was an atempt by noir to make figs more popular / easy to fly, more specifically to make them fly like ints.

The soociety for requiring skill to fly figs never liked people trying to fly figs like ints, and doesn't like attempts to change them to let people fly them like that.
Adept
Posts: 8660
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Turku, Finland

Post by Adept »

madpeople wrote:QUOTE (madpeople @ Nov 21 2009, 03:39 PM) The soociety for requiring skill to fly figs never liked people trying to fly figs like ints, and doesn't like attempts to change them to let people fly them like that.
Where do I sign up for this society?

As for the scale suggestions and such, I'd support reducing the IC fig significantly, and upping at least the bios fig scale a bit. But, and this is a big but. One change at a time. It's the basic empirical science principle. Isolate changes (experiments) so you can gauge their effect.

Scrap heavy booster, see what effect it has, then move to the next change as needed.
ImageImageImageImageImage
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
Broodwich
Posts: 5662
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:48 am
Location: Raincity

Post by Broodwich »

we arent going to do more than one thing at a time to sup. however im not sure why hvy boost came up when the biggest change cc did to figs was reduce their size. Besides it's not adv sup that is the biggest problem, its enh sup's ability to hold off equal level exp
QUOTE Drizzo: ha ha good old chap
Drizzo: i am a brit
Drizzo: tut tut
Drizzo: wankarrrrrr
Drizzo: i only have sex whilst in the missionary position[/quote] Fas est et ab hoste doceri - Ovid
Post Reply